Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 30.03.2015 23:12:
Jonathon Mah m...@jonathonmah.com writes:
During a few years of discussing git operations with colleagues, I’ve
found the “git rebase --onto” operation particularly ambiguous. The
reason is that I always describe a rebase operation as
Jonathon Mah wrote:
Personally, I understand “git-rebase --onto new-base old-base” as
meaning “rebase from old-base to new-base”. Some prepositions that
might make this clearer:
$ git rebase --from old-base new-base # “Rebase HEAD onto new-base, from
old-base
Would having an option name
During a few years of discussing git operations with colleagues, I’ve found the
“git rebase --onto” operation particularly ambiguous. The reason is that I
always describe a rebase operation as “onto” something else (because of the
English phrase “A is based on B”). For example:
$ git rebase
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:49:34PM -0700, Jonathon Mah wrote:
During a few years of discussing git operations with colleagues, I’ve found
the “git rebase --onto” operation particularly ambiguous. The reason is that
I always describe a rebase operation as “onto” something else (because of the
Jonathon Mah m...@jonathonmah.com writes:
During a few years of discussing git operations with colleagues, I’ve
found the “git rebase --onto” operation particularly ambiguous. The
reason is that I always describe a rebase operation as “onto”
something else (because of the English phrase “A is
5 matches
Mail list logo
