Hans Jerry Illikainen writes:
> Thanks! t7612-merge-verify-signatures.sh also lacks cleanup for
> test_must_fail brokenness. Would you prefer test_when_finished to be
> included in the two patches as a v3?
No, I do not want a v3 as these are already in 'next'. Just like my
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:48:29AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Here is what I would propose as a follow-up polishing.
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH 3/2] t5573: clean up after unexpected success of 'pull', too
>
> The previous step added test_when_finished to tests that run 'git
> pull' with
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Interestingly, the tests that do expect 'git pull' to succeed
> protect themselves with "when-finished" mechanism correctly [*1*],
> like so:
>
>> +test_expect_success GPG 'pull signed commit with --verify-signatures' '
>> +test_when_finished "git
Hans Jerry Illikainen writes:
> +test_expect_success GPG 'pull unsigned commit with --verify-signatures' '
> + test_must_fail git pull --ff-only --verify-signatures unsigned
> 2>pullerror &&
> + test_i18ngrep "does not have a GPG signature" pullerror
> +'
Note that
4 matches
Mail list logo