On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>>
>>> This reverts the i18n part of 7f81463 (Use correct grammar in diffstat
>>> summary line - 2012-02-01) but still keeps the grammar correctness for
>>> English. It also revert
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>
>> This reverts the i18n part of 7f81463 (Use correct grammar in diffstat
>> summary line - 2012-02-01) but still keeps the grammar correctness for
>> English. It also reverts b354f11 (Fix tests under GETTEXT_POISON on
>> diffstat - 2012-0
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:47:09PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > I agree that the line is not bright. I do not know if it is worthwhile
>> > or not. I think it will solve some practical problems, but it may also
>> > introduce others. But
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:47:09PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > I agree that the line is not bright. I do not know if it is worthwhile
> > or not. I think it will solve some practical problems, but it may also
> > introduce others. But basically having a per-repo LANG setting (which
> > is wh
Jeff King writes:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:26:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King writes:
>>
>> > I do not think they are incompatible if you separate it into three
>> > categories: machine readable (must never be translated), for the current
>> > user right now (current i18n),
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:26:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > I do not think they are incompatible if you separate it into three
> > categories: machine readable (must never be translated), for the current
> > user right now (current i18n), and for sharing with other
Jeff King writes:
> I do not think they are incompatible if you separate it into three
> categories: machine readable (must never be translated), for the current
> user right now (current i18n), and for sharing with other humans
> (i18n.projectlang).
Anything you see as a user is potentially use
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:10:41PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > I suspect we will end up with people not setting i18n.projectlang, and
> > getting Klingon diffstats on the list.
>
> Yes, but when our starting point is that the diffstat summary is not
> meant for machin
Jeff King writes:
> I suspect we will end up with people not setting i18n.projectlang, and
> getting Klingon diffstats on the list.
Yes, but when our starting point is that the diffstat summary is not
meant for machine consumption, which I tend to agree, that is a
logical consequence no matter h
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:40:12AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > More than one people explicitly said that they do not want to see
> > this in Klingon. Even if the system is fully internationalized,
> > these "... (+), ... (-)" should never be localized, just like we
> > will never localize "d
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>
>> Git is still partly i18n-ized, turning a few strings back does not
>> seem a big regression.
>
> More than one people explicitly said that they do not want to see
> this in Klingon. Even if the system is fully internationalized,
> the
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> Git is still partly i18n-ized, turning a few strings back does not
> seem a big regression.
More than one people explicitly said that they do not want to see
this in Klingon. Even if the system is fully internationalized,
these "... (+), ... (-)" should never be
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:16:26PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> This reverts the i18n part of 7f81463 (Use correct grammar in diffstat
> summary line - 2012-02-01) but still keeps the grammar correctness for
> English. It also reverts b354f11 (Fix tests under GETTEXT_POISON on
> diffstat -
13 matches
Mail list logo
