On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:25:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Pickfire writes:
> +- `sh` suitable for source code in POSIX-compatible shells.
The new test you added seems to show that this is not limited to
POSIX shells but also understands bashisms like ${x//x/x}. Perhaps
drop "POSIX-comp
Pickfire writes:
>> > +- `sh` suitable for source code in POSIX-compatible shells.
>>
>> The new test you added seems to show that this is not limited to
>> POSIX shells but also understands bashisms like ${x//x/x}. Perhaps
>> drop "POSIX-compatible" from here
>
> Those shells are still POSIX-c
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ivan Tham writes:
>
> > Shell are widely used but comes with lots of different patterns. The
> > build-in pattern aim for POSIX-compatible shells with some additions:
> >
> > - Notably ${g//re/s} and ${g#cut}
> > - "function" from bash
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan Tham
>
Ivan Tham writes:
> Shell are widely used but comes with lots of different patterns. The
> build-in pattern aim for POSIX-compatible shells with some additions:
>
> - Notably ${g//re/s} and ${g#cut}
> - "function" from bash
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Tham
> ---
> Documentation/gitattributes.txt |
4 matches
Mail list logo