Re: Confusing git log --- First time bug submission please advise on best practices

2014-02-07 Thread Francis Stephens
Thanks for your clear response. I can see where I went wrong now. On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org writes: The commits that are in the log for master and which are not in the log for originssh/master are merged in at 6833fd4

Re: Confusing git log --- First time bug submission please advise on best practices

2014-02-07 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:43:46AM +, Francis Stephens wrote: Thanks for your clear response. I can see where I went wrong now. Maybe something like this would help avoid confusion a bit in the future? This toy patch puts a horizontal line as a break between two commits if they are not

Re: Confusing git log --- First time bug submission please advise on best practices

2014-02-07 Thread demerphq
On 7 February 2014 18:26, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:43:46AM +, Francis Stephens wrote: Thanks for your clear response. I can see where I went wrong now. Maybe something like this would help avoid confusion a bit in the future? This toy patch puts a

Re: Confusing git log --- First time bug submission please advise on best practices

2014-02-06 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Francis Stephens francissteph...@gmail.com wrote: My co-worker has an inconsistent git log output. Please see that attached files for output (I've made a best effort to remove confidential info from them). Comparing the two log commands we can see that master

Re: Confusing git log --- First time bug submission please advise on best practices

2014-02-06 Thread David Kastrup
Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org writes: The commits that are in the log for master and which are not in the log for originssh/master are merged in at 6833fd4 (HEAD, master); Completed merge. As git log can only present the commits in a linear way, it shows the commits from the ancentry