* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
in fact, this attack cannot even be proven to be malicious, purely via
the email from Malice: it could be incredible bad luck that caused that
good-looking patch to be mistakenly matching a dangerous
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The compromise relies on you having reviewed something harmless, while
in reality what happened within the DB was far less harmless. And the
DB remains self-consistent: neither fsck, nor others importing your
tree will be able to detect the
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 06:03:33PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:55:37PM CEST, I got a letter
where Simon Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:19:24AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
Simon
given that you have multiple
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:23:26PM CEST, I got a letter
where Erik van Konijnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:35:07PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Hmm. I actually don't like this naming. I think it's not too consistent,
is irregular, therefore
Is that some thing you want to see? Maybe clean up the error printing.
Chris
--- /dev/null 2003-01-30 05:24:37.0 -0500
+++ merge.py2005-04-14 16:34:39.0 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+import re
+import sys
+import os
+from pprint import pprint
+
+def
5 matches
Mail list logo
