Jens Lehmann writes:
> Am 02.06.2013 20:50, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Jens Lehmann writes:
>>
>>> Am 30.05.2013 01:58, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
* jl/submodule-mv (2013-04-23) 5 commits
(merged to 'next' on 2013-04-23 at c04f574)
+ submodule.c: duplicate real_path's return valu
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 06:57:34PM -0400, Phil Hord wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:48 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> > The problem is that sometimes you do want to adjust the path and
> > sometimes you don't. Reading git-submodule(1), it says:
> >
> > This may be either an absolute URL, or (if
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:48 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:17:17PM +1000, Heiko Voigt wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:10:45AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:29:51PM +1000, Heiko Voigt wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:23:41PM +0100, Joh
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:39:25PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Am 04.06.2013 14:48, schrieb John Keeping:
> > The problem is that sometimes you do want to adjust the path and
> > sometimes you don't. Reading git-submodule(1), it says:
> >
> > This may be either an absolute URL, or (if it be
Am 04.06.2013 14:48, schrieb John Keeping:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:17:17PM +1000, Heiko Voigt wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:10:45AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:29:51PM +1000, Heiko Voigt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:23:41PM +0100, John Keeping wro
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:17:17PM +1000, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:10:45AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:29:51PM +1000, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:23:41PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> > > > > Sorry, I should have been more
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:10:45AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:29:51PM +1000, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:23:41PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> > > > Sorry, I should have been more specific here. I saw that you did some
> > > > changes to make "submo
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:29:51PM +1000, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:23:41PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> > > Sorry, I should have been more specific here. I saw that you did some
> > > changes to make "submodule add" do the right thing with relative paths,
> > > but the follow
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:23:41PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> > Sorry, I should have been more specific here. I saw that you did some
> > changes to make "submodule add" do the right thing with relative paths,
> > but the following change to t7406 does not work like I believe it
> > should but in
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:47:23PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Am 31.05.2013 21:40, schrieb John Keeping:
> > The current version does make '$sm_path' relative in "submodule
> > foreach", although it's hard to spot because we have to leave doing so
> > until right before the "eval".
>
> Yes. If I
Am 31.05.2013 21:40, schrieb John Keeping:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:23:40PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
>> Am 30.05.2013 01:58, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>> * jk/submodule-subdirectory-ok (2013-04-24) 3 commits
>>> (merged to 'next' on 2013-04-24 at 6306b29)
>>> + submodule: fix quoting in rel
Am 02.06.2013 20:50, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Jens Lehmann writes:
>
>> Am 30.05.2013 01:58, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>> * jl/submodule-mv (2013-04-23) 5 commits
>>> (merged to 'next' on 2013-04-23 at c04f574)
>>> + submodule.c: duplicate real_path's return value
>>> (merged to 'next' on 20
John Keeping writes:
> I started looking at this over the weekend but didn't get time to get
> something ready to be submitted. I did find a couple of issues in
> cmd_foreach that make me think this topic should be dropped when "next"
> is rewound and held in pu waiting for a re-roll.
Thanks fo
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:40:51PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:23:40PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> > Am 30.05.2013 01:58, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> > > * jk/submodule-subdirectory-ok (2013-04-24) 3 commits
> > > (merged to 'next' on 2013-04-24 at 6306b29)
> > > + sub
Thomas Rast writes:
> This interacts with the tests from
>
>> * fc/at-head (2013-05-08) 13 commits
>
> to fail valgrind in t1508 like so:
>
> ==22927== Invalid read of size 1
> ==22927==at 0x4C2C71B: __GI_strnlen (mc_replace_strmem.c:377)
> ==22927==by 0x567FF6B: vfprintf (in /lib64
Jens Lehmann writes:
> Am 30.05.2013 01:58, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> * jl/submodule-mv (2013-04-23) 5 commits
>> (merged to 'next' on 2013-04-23 at c04f574)
>> + submodule.c: duplicate real_path's return value
>> (merged to 'next' on 2013-04-19 at 45ae3c9)
>> + rm: delete .gitmodules entr
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:23:40PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Am 30.05.2013 01:58, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> > * jk/submodule-subdirectory-ok (2013-04-24) 3 commits
> > (merged to 'next' on 2013-04-24 at 6306b29)
> > + submodule: fix quoting in relative_path()
> > (merged to 'next' on 2013-0
Junio C Hamano pobox.com> writes:
> * kb/status-ignored-optim-2 (2013-05-29) 1 commit
> - dir.c: fix ignore processing within not-ignored directories
>
> Fix 1.8.3 regressions in the .gitignore path exclusion logic.
Hi,
I see that the Tested-by line in kb/status-ignored-optim-2 (3973cbd)
doe
Am 30.05.2013 01:58, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> * jk/submodule-subdirectory-ok (2013-04-24) 3 commits
> (merged to 'next' on 2013-04-24 at 6306b29)
> + submodule: fix quoting in relative_path()
> (merged to 'next' on 2013-04-22 at f211e25)
> + submodule: drop the top-level requirement
> + rev
Am 30.05.2013 01:58, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> * jl/submodule-mv (2013-04-23) 5 commits
> (merged to 'next' on 2013-04-23 at c04f574)
> + submodule.c: duplicate real_path's return value
> (merged to 'next' on 2013-04-19 at 45ae3c9)
> + rm: delete .gitmodules entry of submodules removed from t
Thomas Rast wrote:
> diff --git i/sha1_name.c w/sha1_name.c
> index 5ea16ff..a07558d 100644
> --- i/sha1_name.c
> +++ w/sha1_name.c
> @@ -538,7 +538,6 @@ static int get_sha1_basic(const char *str, int len,
> unsigned char *sha1)
> "back to %s.", len, str,
>
Junio C Hamano writes:
> * rr/die-on-missing-upstream (2013-05-22) 2 commits
> - sha1_name: fix error message for @{}, @{}
> - sha1_name: fix error message for @{u}
>
> When a reflog notation is used for implicit "current branch", we
> did not say which branch and worse said "branch ''".
>
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
