Mike Rappazzo rappa...@gmail.com writes:
diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
index dc3133f..e2d5ffc 100644
--- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
+++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
@@ -977,7 +977,18 @@ else
revisions=$onto...$orig_head
shortrevisions=$shorthead
I find that If I am doing a rebase with the intention to squash or
re-order commits, it is helpful to know the commit author.
However, the alteration that I have made to git-rebase--interactive
may not be entirely correct. Here is the change:
---
diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Mike Rappazzo rappa...@gmail.com writes:
I find that If I am doing a rebase with the intention to squash or
re-order commits, it is helpful to know the commit author.
There is not a fundamental reason why the remainder of
Mike Rappazzo rappa...@gmail.com writes:
I find that If I am doing a rebase with the intention to squash or
re-order commits, it is helpful to know the commit author.
There is not a fundamental reason why the remainder of the line
after the object name in the rebase insn sheet should not be
I think the custom format makes sense. I took a first pass.
A config option 'rebase.interactive.todo-format' can override the
default 'oneline' format of the TODO list. Since the list is
parsed using the left, right or boundary mark plus the sha1, then if the
custom format does not start with
5 matches
Mail list logo
