What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2014, #06; Thu, 26)

2014-06-26 Thread Junio C Hamano
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. Fixes accumulated on the 'master' front made into 2.0.1. The topics in flight continue to separate into two distinct layers (i.e. stalled-and-n

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2014, #06; Thu, 26)

2014-06-28 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * nd/split-index (2014-06-13) 32 commits > - t1700: new tests for split-index mode > - t2104: make sure split index mode is off for the version test > - read-cache: force split index mode with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX > - read-tree: note abo

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2014, #06; Thu, 26)

2014-06-29 Thread Johannes Sixt
Am 27.06.2014 00:02, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Four mingw series are still in limbo--are they in good enough shape > for Windows folks who wanted to upstream them? I've now tested the Unicode patches a bit, and I didn't notice a regression in my use-cases. The patches are good to go, IMHO. -- Han

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2014, #06; Thu, 26)

2014-07-01 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Sixt writes: > Am 27.06.2014 00:02, schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> Four mingw series are still in limbo--are they in good enough shape >> for Windows folks who wanted to upstream them? > > I've now tested the Unicode patches a bit, and I didn't notice a > regression in my use-cases. The patc