Jeff King writes:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:35:20AM +0200, Elia Pinto wrote:
>
>> > * ep/http-curl-trace (2016-05-24) 2 commits
>> > - imap-send.c: introduce the GIT_TRACE_CURL enviroment variable
>> > - http.c: implement the GIT_TRACE_CURL environment variable
>> >
>> >
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:35:20AM +0200, Elia Pinto wrote:
> > * ep/http-curl-trace (2016-05-24) 2 commits
> > - imap-send.c: introduce the GIT_TRACE_CURL enviroment variable
> > - http.c: implement the GIT_TRACE_CURL environment variable
> >
> > HTTP transport gained an option to produce
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:32:39AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Mike Hommey writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:08:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> >> * mh/connect (2016-06-06) 10 commits
> >> - connect: [host:port] is legacy for ssh
> >> ...
> >> - connect:
Duy Nguyen writes:
>> * nd/worktree-cleanup-post-head-protection (2016-05-24) 6 commits
>> - worktree: simplify prefixing paths
>> - worktree: avoid 0{40}, too many zeroes, hard to read
>> - worktree.c: use is_dot_or_dotdot()
>> - git-worktree.txt: keep subcommand listing
Mike Hommey writes:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:08:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> * mh/connect (2016-06-06) 10 commits
>> - connect: [host:port] is legacy for ssh
>> ...
>> - connect: document why we sometimes call get_port after get_host_and_port
>>
>> Ok, folks,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * nd/i-t-a-commitable (2016-06-06) 3 commits
> - commit: don't count i-t-a entries when checking if the new commit is empty
> - Resurrect "diff-lib.c: adjust position of i-t-a entries in diff"
> - diff.h: extend
2016-06-15 0:08 GMT+02:00 Junio C Hamano :
> Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
> '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
> '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
> the integration
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:08:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
> '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
> '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
> the integration
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
Git 2.9 has been tagged. Let's
9 matches
Mail list logo