Re: bug? git format-patch -M -D then git am fails

2012-11-14 Thread Michael J Gruber
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 14.11.2012 00:22: Joe Perches j...@perches.com writes: I don't believe that reversibility is a really useful aspect of deletion patches when there are known git repositories involved. You can read reversibility as safety if you want. We would want to

bug? git format-patch -M -D then git am fails

2012-11-13 Thread Joe Perches
If a file is deleted with git rm and a patch is then generated with git format-patch -M - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

bug? git format-patch -M -D then git am fails

2012-11-13 Thread Joe Perches
(Sorry about the partial message. evolution and ctrl-enter sends, grumble...) If a file is deleted with git rm and a patch is then generated with git format-patch -M -D git am is unable to apply the resultant patch. Is this working as designed? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: bug? git format-patch -M -D then git am fails

2012-11-13 Thread Junio C Hamano
Joe Perches j...@perches.com writes: (Sorry about the partial message. evolution and ctrl-enter sends, grumble...) If a file is deleted with git rm and a patch is then generated with git format-patch -M -D git am is unable to apply the resultant patch. Is this working as designed? I

Re: bug? git format-patch -M -D then git am fails

2012-11-13 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 14:55 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: Joe Perches j...@perches.com writes: (Sorry about the partial message. evolution and ctrl-enter sends, grumble...) If a file is deleted with git rm and a patch is then generated with git format-patch -M -D git am is unable to