On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Jakub Narębski jna...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-06-18 at 23:25, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
[...]
One could imagine some frankly, quite rare example
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Tuncer Ayaz tuncer.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Jakub Narębski jna...@gmail.com wrote:
[This is sent from Thunderbird news, so it should be all right]
This is fine, the other one was broken. Out of curiosity what's the
difference
On 2015-06-18 at 23:25, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
[...]
One could imagine some frankly, quite rare example where there is a
team of people who votes on each commit before it gets sent
-Original Message-
From: Theodore Ts'o
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 6:52 PM
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
By allowing multiple authors, you don't have to decide who's the
primary author, as in such situations usually there is no
primary at
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote:
Author and committer include datetime in the contents of the
field, which is used by Git for heuristics limiting walk. Coauthor
would have the same date as author, isn't it? If, after long
and involved discussion, we didn't add
Junio C Hamano wrote:
j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
Author and committer are used by many git tools; if they weren't part of
the object header, they'd need to be part of some pseudo-header with a
standardized format that git can parse.
Yes, the same goes to the address on Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
By allowing multiple authors, you don't have to decide who's the
primary author, as in such situations usually there is no primary
at all. I sometimes deliberately override
Tuncer Ayaz tuncer.a...@gmail.com writes:
Is this something that breaks the design and would never be implemented,
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Even though I don't have time to work on a feature like this, like
others before me, I've been in situations where I would have liked to
set more than one GIT_AUTHOR_NAME (etc.) for a single commit due to
the involvement of multiple developers in authoring a change.
Is this something that breaks
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 06:52:24PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
By allowing multiple authors, you don't have to decide who's the
primary author, as in such situations usually there is no primary at
all. I sometimes deliberately
j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
Author and committer are used by many git tools; if they weren't part of
the object header, they'd need to be part of some pseudo-header with a
standardized format that git can parse.
Yes, the same goes to the address on Signed-off-by: footers. There
recently
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
By allowing multiple authors, you don't have to decide who's the
primary author, as in such situations usually there is no primary at
all. I sometimes deliberately override the author when committing and
add myself just as another
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 01:57:12PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Tuncer Ayaz tuncer.a...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Tuncer Ayaz tuncer.a...@gmail.com writes:
Is this something that breaks the design and would never be
implemented,
Tuncer Ayaz tuncer.a...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Tuncer Ayaz tuncer.a...@gmail.com writes:
Is this something that breaks the design and would never be
implemented,
Yes.
Junio, thanks for the quick response.
I suppose things have changed
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Tuncer Ayaz tuncer.a...@gmail.com writes:
Is this something that breaks the design and would never be
implemented,
Yes.
Junio, thanks for the quick response.
I suppose things have changed since Jonathan Nieder's response in [1]
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Tuncer Ayaz tuncer.a...@gmail.com writes:
Is this something that breaks the design and would never be
implemented,
Yes.
Junio, thanks for the quick response.
I
j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
Having more than one author field in a commit would likely break things,
but having a coauthor field seems plausible these days. Git added
support for signed commits, and the world didn't end, so it's possible
to extend the commit format.
Something being
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
Having more than one author field in a commit would likely break
things, but having a coauthor field seems plausible these days.
Git added support for signed commits, and the world didn't end, so
it's
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:51:18PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
Having more than one author field in a commit would likely break things,
but having a coauthor field seems plausible these days. Git added
support for signed commits, and the world didn't end,
19 matches
Mail list logo
