Re: future of the mediawiki extension?

2017-11-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Matthieu Moy writes: > I realize I didn't answer this point. The reason you didn't see any > update recently is just that there haven't been any release and > actually not much development for a while on git-multimail. That is perfectly fine. > I still have a list of

Re: future of the mediawiki extension?

2017-11-06 Thread Matthieu Moy
"Junio C Hamano" wrote: > I think the plan was to make code drop from time to time at major > release points of git-multimail, but I do not think we've seen many > updates recently. I realize I didn't answer this point. The reason you didn't see any update recently is just

Re: future of the mediawiki extension?

2017-11-06 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2017-11-07 09:44:03, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Antoine Beaupré writes: > >> On 2017-10-31 10:37:29, Junio C Hamano wrote: There's also a hybrid solution used by git-multimail: have a copy of the code in git.git, but do the development separately. I'm not sure it'd

Re: future of the mediawiki extension?

2017-11-06 Thread Junio C Hamano
Antoine Beaupré writes: > On 2017-10-31 10:37:29, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> There's also a hybrid solution used by git-multimail: have a copy of the >>> code in git.git, but do the development separately. I'm not sure it'd be >>> a good idea for Git-Mediawiki, but I'm

Re: future of the mediawiki extension?

2017-10-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Antoine Beaupré writes: > On 2017-10-30 11:29:55, Matthieu Moy wrote: >>> It should also be mentioned that this contrib isn't very active: I'm not >>> part of the GitHub organization, yet I'm probably the one that's been >>> the most active with patches in the last year (and

Re: future of the mediawiki extension?

2017-10-30 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2017-10-31 10:37:29, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> There's also a hybrid solution used by git-multimail: have a copy of the >> code in git.git, but do the development separately. I'm not sure it'd be >> a good idea for Git-Mediawiki, but I'm mentionning it for completeness. > > I think the plan was

Re: future of the mediawiki extension?

2017-10-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Matthieu Moy writes: > So, my conclusion is that a simpler submission mechanism (GitHub's > pull-requests) and a less picky code review would help Git-Mediawiki. > > From previous discussions, I think Junio will agree with that: he's > reluctant to keeping too much stuff in

Re: future of the mediawiki extension?

2017-10-30 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2017-10-30 11:29:55, Matthieu Moy wrote: >> It should also be mentioned that this contrib isn't very active: I'm not >> part of the GitHub organization, yet I'm probably the one that's been >> the most active with patches in the last year (and I wasn't very active >> at all). > > FYI, I'm no

Re: future of the mediawiki extension?

2017-10-30 Thread Matthieu Moy
[ Please Cc: me in these discussions ] Antoine Beaupré writes: > I think, however, it would be good to have a discussion about the future > of that extension in Git. The extension has a bit of a hybrid presence - > it is partly in git core (as a contrib, but still) and

future of the mediawiki extension?

2017-10-29 Thread Antoine Beaupré
Hi, First thanks for the excellent feedback regarding the mediawiki extension, it's great that obscure extensions like this see such excellent reviews. I think, however, it would be good to have a discussion about the future of that extension in Git. The extension has a bit of a hybrid presence