Matthieu Moy writes:
> I realize I didn't answer this point. The reason you didn't see any
> update recently is just that there haven't been any release and
> actually not much development for a while on git-multimail.
That is perfectly fine.
> I still have a list of
"Junio C Hamano" wrote:
> I think the plan was to make code drop from time to time at major
> release points of git-multimail, but I do not think we've seen many
> updates recently.
I realize I didn't answer this point. The reason you didn't see any
update recently is just
On 2017-11-07 09:44:03, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Antoine Beaupré writes:
>
>> On 2017-10-31 10:37:29, Junio C Hamano wrote:
There's also a hybrid solution used by git-multimail: have a copy of the
code in git.git, but do the development separately. I'm not sure it'd
Antoine Beaupré writes:
> On 2017-10-31 10:37:29, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> There's also a hybrid solution used by git-multimail: have a copy of the
>>> code in git.git, but do the development separately. I'm not sure it'd be
>>> a good idea for Git-Mediawiki, but I'm
Antoine Beaupré writes:
> On 2017-10-30 11:29:55, Matthieu Moy wrote:
>>> It should also be mentioned that this contrib isn't very active: I'm not
>>> part of the GitHub organization, yet I'm probably the one that's been
>>> the most active with patches in the last year (and
On 2017-10-31 10:37:29, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> There's also a hybrid solution used by git-multimail: have a copy of the
>> code in git.git, but do the development separately. I'm not sure it'd be
>> a good idea for Git-Mediawiki, but I'm mentionning it for completeness.
>
> I think the plan was
Matthieu Moy writes:
> So, my conclusion is that a simpler submission mechanism (GitHub's
> pull-requests) and a less picky code review would help Git-Mediawiki.
>
> From previous discussions, I think Junio will agree with that: he's
> reluctant to keeping too much stuff in
On 2017-10-30 11:29:55, Matthieu Moy wrote:
>> It should also be mentioned that this contrib isn't very active: I'm not
>> part of the GitHub organization, yet I'm probably the one that's been
>> the most active with patches in the last year (and I wasn't very active
>> at all).
>
> FYI, I'm no
[ Please Cc: me in these discussions ]
Antoine Beaupré writes:
> I think, however, it would be good to have a discussion about the future
> of that extension in Git. The extension has a bit of a hybrid presence -
> it is partly in git core (as a contrib, but still) and
Hi,
First thanks for the excellent feedback regarding the mediawiki
extension, it's great that obscure extensions like this see such
excellent reviews.
I think, however, it would be good to have a discussion about the future
of that extension in Git. The extension has a bit of a hybrid presence
10 matches
Mail list logo