Matt Glazar writes:
> On a remote, I have two Git commit objects which point to the same tree
> object (created with git commit-tree).
What you are expecting _could_ be implemented by exchanging all
tree and blob objects sending and receiving sides have and computing
the set
makes sense (especially for 'git revert HEAD' situations).
Thank you for your reply, Junio.
-Original Message-
From: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
Date: Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 10:32 AM
To: Matt Glazer <stra...@fb.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vg
From: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
Date: Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 11:42 AM
To: Matt Glazer <stra...@fb.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git-fetch pulls already-pulled objects?
>Matt Glazar <stra...@fb.com> writes:
>
>
On a remote, I have two Git commit objects which point to the same tree
object (created with git commit-tree). If I fetch one of the commits, the
commit object (including the tree object) is fetched. If I then fetch the
other commit, the tree object (and its dependencies) is fetched *again* (I
4 matches
Mail list logo