On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit like a
ProGit/Github promotion site. I don't have anything against either, and
git-scm.com provides a lot of the information that users are looking
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit like a
ProGit/Github promotion site. I
Hey,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit like a
ProGit/Github promotion site. I don't have anything against either,
Scott Chacon scha...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Personally, I consider the recent migration of the Emacs repository to
Git a bigger endorsement but then that's me.
I would love to have Emacs on that page, actually. If you guys want me
Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit
Hey,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
A few other points about git-scm.com:
* as Michael says it still looks a bit like a ProGit/Github promotion site
* some of the pull request can be rejected even if the developers want
them, like this
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:37 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:49 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
since many people coming to the page are doing research to figure out
if they want to switch to it in their companies. It also demonstrates
that these large companies are participating in the open source
community
Uh no, it
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Scott Chacon scha...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Personally, I consider the recent migration of the Emacs repository to
Git a bigger endorsement but then that's me.
I would love to have Emacs on that
Hi,
David Kastrup wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
If people don't like git-scm.com and want to have an alternate site,
I think that's the basic problem here.
With all due respect:
I don't actually see a major problem here. Any serious problems with
the site can be fixed by people
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
If people don't like git-scm.com and want to have an alternate site,
I think that's the basic problem here. As long as people want to _have_
an alternate site rather than want to _write_ and _maintain_ an
alternate site, any site will only be as representative
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:52:34AM -0700, Scott Chacon wrote:
* some of the pull request can be rejected even if the developers want
them, like this pull request to add back a list of contributors was:
https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/pull/216
(By the way this pull request talks
12 matches
Mail list logo
