Re: git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?

2016-09-27 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > Paul Smith writes: > >> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 14:57 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Paul Smith wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi all. I'm trying to create a relocatable

Re: git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?

2016-09-27 Thread Junio C Hamano
Paul Smith writes: > On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 14:57 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Paul Smith wrote: >> > >> > Hi all. I'm trying to create a relocatable installation of Git 2.9.2, >> > so I can copy it anywhere

Re: git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?

2016-09-27 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Paul, On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Paul Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 14:57 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > > > > > > Hi all. I'm trying to create a relocatable installation of Git 2.9.2, > > > so I can copy it

Re: git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?

2016-09-27 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 14:57 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > > > > Hi all. I'm trying to create a relocatable installation of Git 2.9.2, > > so I can copy it anywhere and it continues to run without any problem. > > This

Re: git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?

2016-09-26 Thread Junio C Hamano
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > Hi all. I'm trying to create a relocatable installation of Git 2.9.2, > so I can copy it anywhere and it continues to run without any problem. > This is on GNU/Linux systems, FWIW. I had an impression that the setting

git 2.9.2: is RUNTIME_PREFIX supposed to work?

2016-09-26 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all.  I'm trying to create a relocatable installation of Git 2.9.2, so I can copy it anywhere and it continues to run without any problem. This is on GNU/Linux systems, FWIW. Looking through the code (for some other reason) I discovered the RUNTIME_PREFIX setting which appears to attempt to