On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:19:43AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
Just because Git allows distributed workflows, doesn't mean we
should only focus on being distributed IMHO.
The question for content not being mergable easily pops up all
the time. (Game/Graphics designers, documents, all this
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Fredrik Gustafsson iv...@iveqy.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:19:43AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
Just because Git allows distributed workflows, doesn't mean we
should only focus on being distributed IMHO.
The question for content not being mergable
Just because Git allows distributed workflows, doesn't mean we
should only focus on being distributed IMHO.
The question for content not being mergable easily pops up all
the time. (Game/Graphics designers, documents, all this binary
stuff, where there is no good merge driver).
I could imagine a
Thanks folks, I am digesting all you have said.
Now the command line I can do (I'm a programmer) but the secretary here I doubt.
So is there at GUI interface for this? Does it work on Windows systems?
Thanks,
Paul
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
Just because Git allows
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 13:21:44 -0500
hack...@suddenlink.net wrote:
Thanks folks, I am digesting all you have said.
Now the command line I can do (I'm a programmer) but the secretary
here I doubt.
So is there at GUI interface for this? Does it work on Windows
systems?
That's why I asked
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:21 AM, hack...@suddenlink.net wrote:
Thanks folks, I am digesting all you have said.
I did not intend to answer your original question, but to start a
discussion on the
feasibility of a dedicated git lock command.
There are lots of things which are checked in
6 matches
Mail list logo