On Tue, 9 Oct 2018, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 09 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Jeff King writes:
> >
> >> I think that is the best we could do for "-S", though, which is
> >> inherently about counting hits.
> >>
> >> For "-G", we are literally grepping the diff. It
On Tue, Oct 09 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>> I think that is the best we could do for "-S", though, which is
>> inherently about counting hits.
>>
>> For "-G", we are literally grepping the diff. It does not seem
>> unreasonable to add the ability to grep only "-" or "+"
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:22 PM Jeff King wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 08:09:32AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > > Julia Lawall writes:
> > >
> > > >> Doing the same for -S is much harder at the machinery level, as it
> > > >> performs
Jeff King writes:
> I think that is the best we could do for "-S", though, which is
> inherently about counting hits.
>
> For "-G", we are literally grepping the diff. It does not seem
> unreasonable to add the ability to grep only "-" or "+" lines, and the
> interface for that should be pretty
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:22 PM Jeff King wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 08:09:32AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Julia Lawall writes:
> >
> > >> Doing the same for -S is much harder at the machinery level, as it
> > >> performs its thing without internally running "diff" twice, but just
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 08:09:32AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Julia Lawall writes:
>
> >> Doing the same for -S is much harder at the machinery level, as it
> >> performs its thing without internally running "diff" twice, but just
> >> counts the number of occurrences of 'foo'---that is
Julia Lawall writes:
>> Doing the same for -S is much harder at the machinery level, as it
>> performs its thing without internally running "diff" twice, but just
>> counts the number of occurrences of 'foo'---that is sufficient for
>> its intended use, and more efficient.
>
> There is still the
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 5:16 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> Git log -S or -G make it possible to find commits that have particular
> >> words in the changed lines. Sometimes
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 5:16 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
>> Git log -S or -G make it possible to find commits that have particular
>> words in the changed lines. Sometimes it would be helpful to search for
>> words in the removed lines
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 5:16 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
> Git log -S or -G make it possible to find commits that have particular
> words in the changed lines. Sometimes it would be helpful to search for
> words in the removed lines or in the added lines specifically. From the
> implement
Hello,
Git log -S or -G make it possible to find commits that have particular
words in the changed lines. Sometimes it would be helpful to search for
words in the removed lines or in the added lines specifically. From the
implementation, I had the impression that this would be easy to implement
11 matches
Mail list logo