On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 12:27:31 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Ulrich Spörlein venit, vidit, dixit 09.11.2012 19:27:
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:16:47 -0500, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 04:52:48PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes:
2. Why
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes:
But this will never be changed, it would break the fundamental git
storage model as it is in place now.
It doesn't just break storage model, but more importantly, it
breaks the semantics.
Imagine that things started breaking after merging your topic
Ulrich Spörlein venit, vidit, dixit 09.11.2012 19:27:
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:16:47 -0500, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 04:52:48PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes:
2. Why the hell is the commit hash dependent on the ordering of the
parent
Hi all,
I'm running a couple of conversions from SVN to git, using a slightly
hacked version of svn2git (because it can cope with multiple branches
and is several orders of magnitude faster than git-svn).
Anyway, when doing some verification runs, using the same version of
svn2git, but different
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes:
Two questions:
1. Can we impose a stable ordering of the commits being recorded in a
merge commit? Listing parents in chronological order or something like
that.
The order is determined by the order the refs are given to git merge (or
git
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 16:04:31 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes:
Two questions:
1. Can we impose a stable ordering of the commits being recorded in a
merge commit? Listing parents in chronological order or something like
that.
The order is
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes:
2. Why the hell is the commit hash dependent on the ordering of the
parent commits? IMHO it should sort the set of parents before
calculating the hash ...
What would be the sort key?
Trivially, the hash of the parents itself. So you'd always
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 04:52:48PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes:
2. Why the hell is the commit hash dependent on the ordering of the
parent commits? IMHO it should sort the set of parents before
calculating the hash ...
What would be the
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:16:47 -0500, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 04:52:48PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes:
2. Why the hell is the commit hash dependent on the ordering of the
parent commits? IMHO it should sort the set of parents
9 matches
Mail list logo
