Re: no luck with colors for branch names in gitk yet

2016-02-05 Thread John Keeping
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 01:29:26PM -0900, Britton Kerin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Philip Oakley wrote: > > From: "Britton Kerin" > >> > >> Someone suggested using color.branch.upstream, I tried like this and > >> variants > >> > >> [color "branch"] > >> local = red bold > >> ups

Re: no luck with colors for branch names in gitk yet

2016-02-05 Thread Britton Kerin
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Britton Kerin" >> >> Someone suggested using color.branch.upstream, I tried like this and >> variants >> >> [color "branch"] >> local = red bold >> upstream = red bold >> >> Doesn't seem to matter what I put in for upstream, includi

Re: no luck with colors for branch names in gitk yet

2016-02-05 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Britton Kerin" Someone suggested using color.branch.upstream, I tried like this and variants [color "branch"] local = red bold upstream = red bold Doesn't seem to matter what I put in for upstream, including invalid colors, gitk just ignores it and does the dark green for local branc

no luck with colors for branch names in gitk yet

2016-02-05 Thread Britton Kerin
Someone suggested using color.branch.upstream, I tried like this and variants [color "branch"] local = red bold upstream = red bold Doesn't seem to matter what I put in for upstream, including invalid colors, gitk just ignores it and does the dark green for local branches -- To unsubscribe fr