Hello!
I've been trying out git and have some questions...
I installed the latest snapshot of git, pulled down the
kernel (2.6.13-rc7), and started hacking. What fun...got myself
a git patch and was happy.
Then, decided I wanted to branch off my changes from the
main tree so I could maintain
On 8/29/05, Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a new branch 'ben_dev_rfcnt'.
Now, I also have another patch that I wanted to pull into git.
Before merging this, I created another branch 'foo'.
I changed to this branch foo and imported my patch and resolved the
conflicts, etc.
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Ben Greear wrote:
I think I'm missing something fundamental though... I wanted to
change to the ben_dev_rfcnt branch to build a kernel without my
additional patch. git branch ben_dev_rfcnt seems to change
it fine, but all of the changes for repository 'foo' are also
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Ben Greear wrote:
I think I'm missing something fundamental though... I wanted to
change to the ben_dev_rfcnt branch to build a kernel without my
additional patch. git branch ben_dev_rfcnt seems to change
it fine, but all of the changes for
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 10:03, Linus Torvalds wrote:
(Both git branch and git checkout -b branchname that reate a new
This of course, is Git's answer to the long standing
UNIX tradition. Whereas UNIX would creat() files,
Git will reate() branches.
Linus
jdl
-
5 matches
Mail list logo