On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 01:27:57AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> On 11/10/17 23:34, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> [snip]
> > Hi Ramsay,
> >
> > I assume, given you're emailing me, that this is a Cygwin failure?
>
> Yes, sorry, I should have made that clear.
>
> > t0021.15 has PERL as a requirement,
On 11/10/17 23:34, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
[snip]
> Hi Ramsay,
>
> I assume, given you're emailing me, that this is a Cygwin failure?
Yes, sorry, I should have made that clear.
> t0021.15 has PERL as a requirement, and I see semi-regular failures from
> Git tests that are Perl-based in one way
Hi,
Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> t0021.15 has PERL as a requirement, and I see semi-regular failures from
> Git tests that are Perl-based in one way or another (git-svn tests are
> the most common problems). I've not spotted t0021 failing in that way,
> but it sounds like the same class of problem.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:15:57PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> I had a test failure on the v2.15.0-rc1 build tonight.
> The test in question being t0021-conversion.sh #15
> ('required process filter should filter data'). I didn't
> have any test failures on v2.15.0-rc0, and I don't
On 11/10/17 23:15, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> I had a test failure on the v2.15.0-rc1 build tonight.
> The test in question being t0021-conversion.sh #15
> ('required process filter should filter data'). I didn't
> have any test failures on v2.15.0-rc0, and I don't see
> any change that
Hi Adam,
I had a test failure on the v2.15.0-rc1 build tonight.
The test in question being t0021-conversion.sh #15
('required process filter should filter data'). I didn't
have any test failures on v2.15.0-rc0, and I don't see
any change that would have affected this test.
Also, I ran this test
6 matches
Mail list logo
