Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-13 Thread Arif Khokar
On 02/13/2017 10:56 PM, Arif Khokar wrote: I wasn't aware of that expectation. My idea was to use NNTP as a way to facilitate the development of a new git utility that would serve as the inverse of git-send-email (sort of like the relationship between git format-patch and git am), rather than

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-13 Thread Arif Khokar
On 02/13/2017 11:41 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> writes: One concern I have regarding this idea is whether or not SMTP servers typically replace a Message-Id header set by the client. The clients are supposed to give Message-IDs, but because some c

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-13 Thread Junio C Hamano
Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> writes: > One concern I have regarding this idea is whether or not SMTP servers > typically replace a Message-Id header set by the client. The clients are supposed to give Message-IDs, but because some clients fail to do so, SMTP server imp

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2016-08-26 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Arif, On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote: > On 08/25/2016 09:01 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote: > > >>> I considered recommending this as some way to improve the review > >>> process. The problem, o

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-13 Thread Arif Khokar
On 02/13/2017 02:21 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> writes: ... I still think it would be better to be able to list the message-id values in the header or body of the cover letter message of a patch series (preferably the former) in order to faci

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2016-08-25 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Arif, On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:04 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Philip Oakley wrote: > > >> I do note that dscho's patches now have the extra footer (below the > >> three dashes) e.g. > &

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-13 Thread Eric Wong
Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/13/2017 09:37 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >I actually had expected *you* to put in a little bit of an effort, too. In > >fact, I was very disappointed that you did not even look into porting that > >script

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-13 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:41:51PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> writes: > > > One concern I have regarding this idea is whether or not SMTP servers > > typically replace a Message-Id header set by the client. > > The client

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-13 Thread Junio C Hamano
Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> writes: > ... I > still think it would be better to be able to list the message-id > values in the header or body of the cover letter message of a patch > series (preferably the former) in order to facilitate downloading the > patche

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-13 Thread Arif Khokar
On 02/13/2017 09:37 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: Hi Arif, On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Arif Khokar wrote: Thanks for the link. One thing that comes to mind that is that it may be better to just download the patches and then manually apply them afterwords rather than doing it in the script itself

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-12 Thread Arif Khokar
On 02/10/2017 11:10 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: Hi Arif, On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote: I recently adapted an old script I had to apply an entire patch series given the GMane link to its cover letter: https://github.com/git-for-windows/build-extra/blob/master/apply-from

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2016-08-24 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Arif, On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote: > On 08/20/2016 03:57 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote: > > > But perhaps the problem is current lack of tooling in the opposite > > direction, namely getting patches from mailing list and applying them > > to GitHub repo,

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-10 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Arif, On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote: > > > On 08/20/2016 03:57 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote: > > > > > But perhaps the problem is current lack of tooling in the opposite > > > direction, name

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2017-02-13 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Arif, On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Arif Khokar wrote: > On 02/10/2017 11:10 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > I recently adapted an old script I had to apply an entire patch > > > series give

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2016-08-24 Thread Eric Wong
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Arif, > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote: > > > On 08/20/2016 03:57 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote: > > > > > But perhaps the problem is current lack of tooling in the opposite > > >