After http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/261990
the only thing which did not enter the serie is these 2 pathes.
Should be applied over the patches by link, or
ecf2ff6ace6a1cc3d55b6f917be5452b5fb0c21b in current pu.
Max Kirillov (2):
submodule refactor: use
Signed-off-by: Max Kirillov m...@max630.net
---
submodule.c | 28 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index 34094f5..4aad3d4 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -122,43 +122,35 @@ void
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 09:36:43AM -0800, Jens Lehmann wrote:
I wonder if it's worth all the hassle to invent new names. Wouldn't
it be much better to just keep a list of per-worktree configuration
value names and use that inside the config code to decide where to
find them for multiple work
Hi all, thanks for providing your feedback.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
I am not sure if this is not a premature over-engineering---I am not
convinced that such a future need will be fulfilled by passing just
a single default_fn this version already
Because --graph is about connected history while --no-walk
is about discrete points, it does not make sense to allow
giving these two options at the same time. [1]
This change makes a few calls to show --graph fail in
t4052, but asking to show one commit with graph is a
nonsensical thing to do.
Right now we return a NULL struct sha1file if we encounter
an error. However, the sole caller (write_idx_file) does not
check the return value, and will segfault if we hit this
case.
One option would be to handle the error in the caller.
However, there's really nothing for it to do but die. This
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo