A maintenance release Git v1.7.11.7 is now available at the
usual places.
The release tarballs are found at:
http://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list
and their SHA-1 checksums are:
30c7aafaa31002ca52bc45dbd0908e63b00015dd git-1.7.11.7.tar.gz
Does anyone have an idea, what might be wrong here / how to fix it
?
Here: git svn --version
git-svn version 1.7.12.592.g41e7905 (svn 1.6.18)
What's yours?
1.7.9.5 (ubuntu precise)
I'm getting
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/discovery/.git/
Using higher level of URL:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
I think we can start thinking about feature freeze once the topics
in 'next' that are scheduled to graduate to 'master' already are
fully cooked. For any late-coming topic, there always is the next
cycle ;-)
I've not hear anything about my poll patches and I'd really
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 1:36 AM, vi0...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vitaly _Vi Shukela vi0...@gmail.com
Make Ctrl+U for unstaging and Ctrl+J for reverting selection behave
more like Ctrl+T for adding.
They were working only when one area was focused (diff or commit message),
now they should
A while back I posted a proof of concept using wildmatch() from rsync.
Back then the obstacle was case-insensitive matching support. I did not
realize that there was iwildmatch() that does exactly that.
So here again a series that is probably ready for consumption. Now
patterns that contain
These files are from rsync.git commit
d51a3adb4fca3e6b1b046c6e570828f3bca8fe36. The commit is GPL-3. However
wildmatch.[ch] have not changed since rsync turned to GPL-3.
rsync.git - git.git
lib/wildmatch.[ch] compat/wildmatch.[ch]
wildtest.c test-wildmatch.c
One place less to worry about thread safety
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
---
compat/wildmatch.c | 17 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compat/wildmatch.c b/compat/wildmatch.c
index f3a1731..e824eb2 100644
---
dowild() does case insensitive matching by lower-casing the text. That
means lower case letters in patterns imply case-insensitive matching,
but upper case means exact matching.
We do not want that subtlety. Lower case pattern too so iwildmatch()
always does what we expect it to do.
This makes wildmatch.c part of libgit.a and builds test-wildmatch
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 6 ++
compat/wildmatch.c | 8 +++-
t/t3070-wildmatch.sh | 27 +++
test-wildmatch.c | 8 +++-
4 files
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
---
Documentation/gitignore.txt | 3 +++
attr.c | 4 +++-
dir.c | 5 -
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gitignore.txt b/Documentation/gitignore.txt
Hi,
Earlier this month I asked how best to handle two branches without a
common ancestor to sync changes from one branch to another. Initially
I did this via the grafts mechanism, but this wasn't a shared
solution, in that the graft was local to my checkout of the repository
and no one else's.
On Saturday 2012-09-15 15:24, Yi, EungJun wrote:
bee-lob or bla:b?
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/blob
BLOB as a Binary Large OBject reeks of a retronym.
I guess bee-lob is correct if it means binary large object. But I'm
not sure because gitglossary does not tell me about that.
--
To
The git format-patch allows numbered patches to be created, however I'm
not sure how folk generate the initial 0/n patch. Which of the various
options should I be using?
Also, being on windows, the various 'mbox' and 'MUA' discussions are new
to me, so the format-patch step where :-
Typically
Thanks for your help, Jan!
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Jan Engelhardt jeng...@inai.de wrote:
On Saturday 2012-09-15 15:24, Yi, EungJun wrote:
bee-lob or bla:b?
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/blob
BLOB as a Binary Large OBject reeks of a retronym.
I guess bee-lob is correct if it means
Philip Oakley philipoak...@iee.org writes:
Typically it will be placed in a MUA’s drafts folder, edited to add
timely commentary that should not go in the changelog after the three
dashes, and then sent as a message whose body, in our example, starts
with arch/arm config files were…. On the
From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 7:01 PM
To: Joachim Schmitz
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2012, #05; Fri, 14)
Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
I think we can
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Yi, EungJun semtlen...@gmail.com wrote:
bee-lob or bla:b?
Like Bob, add an L in there.
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
David Chanters david.chant...@googlemail.com writes:
1. I thought the replace data in .git/refs/replace was published when
I did git push so that others could use this information as a
base-point, yet it seems not to be the case. How do I publish this?
If you don't tell it what to push, the
gcc complains as follows:
CC test-generation.o
test-generation.c: In function `main':
test-generation.c:105: warning: control reaches end of \
non-void function
In order to suppress the warning, we simply add a suitable
return statement to main().
Signed-off-by: Ramsay
The flag will allow the user to edit the todo file while they're in the middle
of an interactive rebase. It simply invoke the editor and do nothing else.
More discussions here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/205133/focus=205182
Andrew Wong (3):
rebase -i: Refactor
Looks good to me, ack.
On 09/09/12 21:16, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoffp...@padd.com
---
t/lib-git-p4.sh | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/lib-git-p4.sh b/t/lib-git-p4.sh
index 2d753ab..482eeac 100644
--- a/t/lib-git-p4.sh
+++
Hi,
On 15 September 2012 18:21, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
David Chanters david.chant...@googlemail.com writes:
2. If I do publish it, are there any caveats with that? i.e.,
because the replace data will likely point to a repo which in my
working checkout I added with
git-p4 won't be quite the same without these completely misleading and
confusing messages :-)
Ack.
On 09/09/12 21:16, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
When a patch failed to apply, these interactive options offered
to:
1) apply the patch anyway, leaving reject (.rej) files around, or,
2)
I'll need to supply a followup patch to ensure that a config option can
override the prompt.
Ack.
On 09/09/12 21:16, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
When applying a commit to the p4 workspace fails, a prompt
asks what to do next. This belongs up in run() instead
of in applyCommit(), where run() can
Ack.
On 09/09/12 21:16, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
When editing the submit template, if no change was made to it,
git p4 offers a prompt Submit anyway?. Answering no cancels
the submit.
Previously, a no answer behaves like a [s]kip answer to the
failed-patch prompt, in that it proceeded to try to
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:49 PM, David Chanters
david.chant...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 15 September 2012 18:21, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Assuming that they do, pushing the replacement ref makes the
replacing object available in the pushed-into repository, so
they
I have created a GIT repository on Linux 64 bit machine.
When I tried to clone GIT repository on windows 7 machine then I am getting
below error.
Error:
git-upload-pack: error while loading shared libraries: libiconv.so.2: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
fatal: The
Add Ada xfuncname and wordRegex patterns to the list of builtin
patterns.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Johnson ajohn...@redneon.com
---
Documentation/gitattributes.txt | 2 ++
t/t4018-diff-funcname.sh| 2 +-
t/t4034-diff-words.sh | 1 +
t/t4034/ada/expect | 27
28 matches
Mail list logo
