Re: [PATCH v5 01/28] path.c: make get_pathname() return strbuf instead of static buffer

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote: On 2014-03-08 03.47, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: We've been avoiding PATH_MAX whenever possible. This patch makes get_pathname() return a strbuf and updates the callers to take advantage of this. The code is simplified

Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Add interpret-trailers builtin

Junio C Hamano gitster at pobox.com writes: ... is easier to read and maintain if written like so (with using HT properly---our MUAs may damage it and turn the indentation into spaces): ... sed -e s/ Z$/ / expect -\EOF Fixes: Z Acked-by= Z

git 1.9.0 segfault

Hi, http://pastebin.com/Np7L54ar Cheers, -- Guillaume Gelin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: git 1.9.0 segfault

On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 04:23:43PM +, Guillaume Gelin wrote: Hi, http://pastebin.com/Np7L54ar I can confirm this. I get the following backtrace: Core was generated by `/home/bmc/checkouts/git/git mv packages/ lisp'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0

Re: [GSoC14][RFC] Proposal Draft: Refactor tempfile handling

Excellent, thank you very much for the feedback, Jeff! It was very helpful and encouraging. I've done some more research based on your comments. Once the logic is extracted into a nice API, there are several other places that can use it, too: ... I've found the following four areas so far: 1.

Re: git 1.9.0 segfault

On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 04:46:51PM +, brian m. carlson wrote: On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 04:23:43PM +, Guillaume Gelin wrote: Hi, http://pastebin.com/Np7L54ar We're failing to rename because we got an EFAULT, and then we try to print the failing filename, and we get a segfault right

[PATCH] builtin/mv: fix out of bounds write

When commit a88c915 (mv: move submodules using a gitfile, 2013-07-30) added the submodule_gitfile array, it was not added to the block that enlarges the arrays when we are moving a directory so that we do not have to worry about it being a directory when we perform the actual move. After this,

Re: [PATCH] builtin/mv: fix out of bounds write

On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 06:35:01PM +, John Keeping wrote: When commit a88c915 (mv: move submodules using a gitfile, 2013-07-30) added the submodule_gitfile array, it was not added to the block that enlarges the arrays when we are moving a directory so that we do not have to worry about it

[PATCH] mv: prevent mismatched data when ignoring errors.

We shrink the source and destination arrays, but not the modes or submodule_gitfile arrays, resulting in potentially mismatched data. Shrink all the arrays at the same time to prevent this. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net --- builtin/mv.c | 5 + 1 file changed,

[PATCH v2] builtin/mv: fix out of bounds write

When commit a88c915 (mv: move submodules using a gitfile, 2013-07-30) added the submodule_gitfile array, it was not added to the block that enlarges the arrays when we are moving a directory so that we do not have to worry about it being a directory when we perform the actual move. After this,

howto to run git without a master branch

Hi, git newbie here. I would like to work with two main branches: master-g and master-x, instead of the usual master, and apparently git does not like this. After creating a local repository with these two branches, and a server repository with git init --bare, and pushing the two branches:

remote rename

Hi, If I have a remote branch origin/topic/foo, running $ git remote rename origin renamed seems to leave directory traces behind: .git/refs/remotes/origin/topic I expected to see .git/refs/remotes/renamed/topic/foo but not .git/refs/remotes/origin. Is this a glitch? I see this with Git

Potential GSOC microproject idea

On Mar 3, 2014, at 23:58, Michael Haggerty wrote: list regulars should FEEL ENCOURAGED to submit microprojects to add to the list. (Either submit them as a pull request to the GitHub repository that contains the text [1] or to the mailing list with CC to me.) Potential idea for a

[PATCH/RFC] rebase: new convenient option to edit/reword/delete a single commit

Prepare the todo list for you to edit/reword/delete the given commit. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com --- Allowing multiple actions is a bit too much for my shell skills. I don't really need it so I won't push it, but if somebody gives me a sketch, I'll try to polish it.

Re: howto to run git without a master branch

On 2014-03-08 22.37, Carlos Pereira wrote: Hi, git newbie here. I would like to work with two main branches: master-g and master-x, instead of the usual master, and apparently git does not like this. After creating a local repository with these two branches, and a server repository

Re: [PATCH v3] commit.c: Replace starts_with() with skip_prefix()

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:49 AM, karthik nayak karthik@gmail.com wrote: Hello Eric, Thanks for your reply, and for that information. should i patch again or this should do? And what next? Talk to the mentor? The ultimate authority deciding if a patch is ready is Junio, as it would have to