From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
Christian Couder chrisc...@tuxfamily.org writes:
diff --git a/wrapper.c b/wrapper.c
index 0cc5636..c46026a 100644
--- a/wrapper.c
+++ b/wrapper.c
@@ -455,3 +455,17 @@ struct passwd *xgetpwuid_self(void)
errno ? strerror(errno) :
From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
Christian Couder chrisc...@tuxfamily.org writes:
Until now git commit has only supported the well known
Signed-off-by: trailer, that is used by many projects like
the Linux kernel and Git.
It is better to implement features for these trailers first
From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/12] Add data structures and basic functions for
commit trailers
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:06:35 -0700
Christian Couder chrisc...@tuxfamily.org writes:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/12] Add data structures and basic functions for
Signed-off-by: Marat Radchenko ma...@slonopotamus.org
---
compat/vcbuild/scripts/clink.pl | 2 ++
config.mak.uname| 1 -
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/compat/vcbuild/scripts/clink.pl b/compat/vcbuild/scripts/clink.pl
index 4374771..a87d0da 100755
Signed-off-by: Marat Radchenko ma...@slonopotamus.org
---
xdiff/xutils.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/xdiff/xutils.c b/xdiff/xutils.c
index 62cb23d..a21a835 100644
--- a/xdiff/xutils.c
+++ b/xdiff/xutils.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include limits.h
#include assert.h
#include
Verify that patch ID is now stable against hunk reordering.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
---
t/t4204-patch-id.sh | 68 +
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t4204-patch-id.sh
Clarify that patch ID is now a sum of hashes, not a hash.
Document --stable and --unstable flags.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
---
Documentation/git-patch-id.txt | 21 -
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
Patch id changes if you reorder hunks in a diff.
As the result is functionally equivalent, this is surprising to many
people.
In particular, reordering hunks is helpful to make patches
more readable (e.g. API header diff before implementation diff).
Change patch-id behaviour making it stable
On 3/25/2014 10:23 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ilya Bobyr ilya.bo...@gmail.com writes:
On 3/24/2014 4:39 AM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
On 24/03/14 08:49, Ilya Bobyr wrote:
[...]
[...]
---valgrind=tool::
+-v,--valgrind=tool::
The -v short option is taken, above ... :-P
Right %)
Thanks :)
On 3/24/2014 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 01:49:44AM -0700, Ilya Bobyr wrote:
Here are some examples of how functionality added by the patch
could be used. In order to run setup tests and then only a
specific test (use case 1) one
This is an update verson of the patches I've posted here:
[RFC/PATCH] Better control of the tests run by a test suite
http://www.mail-archive.com/git@vger.kernel.org/msg46419.html
Chanes are only in the first patch, according to
Allow better control of the set of tests that will be executed for a
single test suite. Mostly useful while debugging or developing as it
allows to focus on a specific test.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Bobyr ilya.bo...@gmail.com
---
No changes from the previous version.
t/README | 65
We used to show (missing ) next to tests skipped because they are
specified in GIT_SKIP_TESTS. Use (GIT_SKIP_TESTS) instead.
Plus tests that check basic GIT_SKIP_TESTS functions.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Bobyr ilya.bo...@gmail.com
---
No changes from the previous version.
t/t-basic.sh | 63
Most arguments that could be provided to a test have short forms.
Unless documented, the only way to learn them is to read the code.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Bobyr ilya.bo...@gmail.com
---
Minor changes according to comments in
http://www.mail-archive.com/git@vger.kernel.org/msg46423.html
Greetings,
I, Liliane send you this email. You can read about me on:
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liliane_Bettencourt
I write to you because I intend to give to you some portion of my Bank
net-worth which I have been putting away for a long time. I want to cede it to
you for charity purpose. If
Hi,
Do we leak the context we allocate in imap-send.c:280 intentionally?
Regards,
--
Thiago Farina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:47:24PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru writes:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:19:58PM +0100, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru wrote:
...
In fact that would be maybe preferred, for
On 03/26/2014 03:40 PM, Siddharth Agarwal wrote:
On 03/26/2014 12:22 AM, Jeff King wrote:
[tl;dr the patch is the same as before, but there is a script to measure
its effects; please try it out on your repos]
Here are the numbers from another, much larger repo:
Test
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 08:21:50PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
[...]
not changed:
- low-level helpers are still named with __ prefix as, imho, that is the
best
convention to name such helpers, without sacrificing signal/noise ratio. All
of them are now static though.
Please find
Hi,
I just found a failure to checkout a project with submodules where
there is no explicit submodule branch configuration, and the
submodules happen to not have a master branch:
git clone git://gitorious.org/qt/qt5.git qt5
cd qt5
git submodule init qtbase
git submodule update
In
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:23:20PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:43:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru writes:
instead of allocating it all the time for every subtree in
__diff_tree_sha1, let's allocate it once in diff_tree_sha1,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 08:21:47PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
As described in previous commit, when recursing into sub-trees, we can
use lower-level tree walker, since its interface is now sha1 based.
The change is ok, because diff_tree_sha1() only invokes
__diff_tree_sha1(), and also, if
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
- Original Message -
The use case in mind is --max-depth=0 to stop recursion. With this we can do
git config --global alias.ls
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 02:34:24PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:46:32AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
What are the downsides of __ prefix by the way?
Aren't these names
Hi,
I'm running:
Ubuntu 13.10 64 bit
and git version
git:amd64/saucy 1:1.8.3.2-1 uptodate
my remote repository is on a Chiliprojekt server (a fork of Redmine).
cloning the repo over http results in following error:
sneher@sneher-XPS:~/Dokumente/test$ git clone
shows gpg signature (if any) for commit message in gitweb
in case of successfully verifying the signature highlights it with green
Signed-off-by: Victor Kartashov victor.kartas...@gmail.com
---
gitweb/gitweb.perl | 33 ++---
gitweb/static/gitweb.css | 5 +
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 03:21:49PM +0100, Johan Herland wrote:
I just found a failure to checkout a project with submodules where
there is no explicit submodule branch configuration, and the
submodules happen to not have a master branch:
The docs say [1]:
A remote branch name for tracking
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:52:08AM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
Working around that to default to the upstream submodule's HEAD is
possible (you can just use --branch HEAD)
Actually, this is probably not a good idea. The initial submodule
addition works:
$ git submodule add -b HEAD
Hi Git developers,
This is my first Git feature request, I hope it wont get me hanged on the
gallows ;o)
*Git feature request:*
Add an option to Git config to configure the criteria for when a git
checkout should abort.
*Name proposal and options:*
checkout.clean false default
Ilya Bobyr ilya.bo...@gmail.com writes:
If there is decision on how shortening should work for all the
options, maybe I could add a paragraph on that and make existing
options more consistent.
We should strive to make the following from gitcli.txt apply
throughout the system:
* many
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
But for a small fetch...
5311.3: server (1 days)0.20(0.17+0.03) 4.39(4.03+6.59) +2095.0%
5311.4: size (1 days) 57.2K 59.5K +4.1%
5311.5: client (1 days)0.08(0.08+0.00) 0.08(0.08+0.00) +0.0%
Nice ;-)
So this
Christian Couder chrisc...@tuxfamily.org writes:
Yeah, but it seems a bit wasteful to allocate memory for a new string,
then downcase it, then compare it with strcmp() and then free it,
instead of just using strcasecmp() on the original string.
I wasn't looking at the caller (and I haven't).
Marat Radchenko ma...@slonopotamus.org writes:
Signed-off-by: Marat Radchenko ma...@slonopotamus.org
---
xdiff/xutils.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/xdiff/xutils.c b/xdiff/xutils.c
index 62cb23d..a21a835 100644
--- a/xdiff/xutils.c
+++ b/xdiff/xutils.c
@@ -23,6
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Patch id changes if you reorder hunks in a diff.
If you reorder hunks, the patch should no longer apply [*1*], so a
feature to make patch-id stable across such move would have no
practical use ;-), but I am guessing you meant something else.
Perhaps
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
I just found a failure to checkout a project with submodules where
there is no explicit submodule branch configuration, and the
submodules happen to not have a master branch:
git clone git://gitorious.org/qt/qt5.git qt5
cd qt5
git submodule
Am 27.03.2014 16:52, schrieb W. Trevor King:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 03:21:49PM +0100, Johan Herland wrote:
I just found a failure to checkout a project with submodules where
there is no explicit submodule branch configuration, and the
submodules happen to not have a master branch:
The docs
Am 27.03.2014 18:16, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
I just found a failure to checkout a project with submodules where
there is no explicit submodule branch configuration, and the
submodules happen to not have a master branch:
git clone
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:58:41AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Patch id changes if you reorder hunks in a diff.
If you reorder hunks, the patch should no longer apply [*1*], so a
feature to make patch-id stable across such move would have no
Junio C Hamano gitster at pobox.com writes:
My gut feeling is that adding a mechanism to add -DINLINE=__inline
only on MSVC to the top-level Makefile, without touching this file,
may be a much more palatable.
Okay, I'll think more about this one. Maybe *moving* inline=__inline from
Jonas Bang em...@jonasbang.dk writes:
Hi Git developers,
This is my first Git feature request, I hope it won’t get me hanged on the
gallows ;o)
*Git feature request:*
Add an option to Git config to configure the criteria for when a git
checkout should abort.
*Name proposal and
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:58:41AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Patch id changes if you reorder hunks in a diff.
If you reorder hunks, the patch should no longer apply [*1*], so a
feature to make patch-id stable across such move would have no
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
I started to remove that code, but then I recalled why I did it like
this. There is a good reason. Yes, you can't simply reorder hunks just
like this. But you can get the same effect by prefixing the header:
Yes, that is one of the things I
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 27.03.2014 16:52, schrieb W. Trevor King:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 03:21:49PM +0100, Johan Herland wrote:
I just found a failure to checkout a project with submodules where
there is no explicit submodule branch configuration, and the
submodules
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:03:46AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
I started to remove that code, but then I recalled why I did it like
this. There is a good reason. Yes, you can't simply reorder hunks just
like this. But you can get the same
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:39:17PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:03:46AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
I started to remove that code, but then I recalled why I did it like
this. There is a good reason. Yes, you
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
(please keep author email)
8
From: Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:21:46 +0400
Subject: [PATCH v3a] tree-diff: rework diff_tree interface to be sha1 based
git am -c will discard everything above the scissors and
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 03:45:34PM +0100, Siggi wrote:
and git version
git:amd64/saucy 1:1.8.3.2-1 uptodate
my remote repository is on a Chiliprojekt server (a fork of Redmine).
cloning the repo over http results in following error:
sneher@sneher-XPS:~/Dokumente/test$ git clone
This series introduces a --function-name=pattern option for git-log, intended
to search for commits which touch a function matching a certain pattern (a
feature we've seen requested and are interested in using ourselves).
This is our first attempt to patch git; we've tried to observe and follow
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
This test builds a sample C file, adding and removing functions, and
checks that the right commits are filtered by --function-name matching.
Signed-off-by: David Dalrymple (on zayin) davi...@alum.mit.edu
---
t/t4213-log-function-name.sh
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
We use userdiff_funcname to make the filetype-dependent function name
pattern available to pickaxe functions.
Signed-off-by: David Dalrymple (on zayin) davi...@alum.mit.edu
---
diffcore-pickaxe.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 9
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
This is similar to the pickaxe grep option (-G), but applies the
provided regex only to diff hunk headers, thereby showing only those
commits which affect a function with a definition line matching the
pattern. These are functions in the
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
The functionality of userdiff_funcname (determining the language in use
for a given file and setting up patterns to match function names in
that language) is useful outside of diff.c, so here we remove its static
specifier and declare it
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
In this file, two functions use identical blocks of code to call the
POSIX regex compiling function and handle a possible error. Here we
factor that block into its own function, in anticipation of using the
same code a third time.
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
This function type previously accepted separate regex_t and kwset_t
parameters, which conceptually go together. Here we create a struct to
encapsulate them, in anticipation of adding a third field that
pickaxe_fn's may require.
This
From: Bhushan Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: David Dalrymple (on zayin) davi...@alum.mit.edu
---
Documentation/diff-options.txt | 9 +
Documentation/gitdiffcore.txt | 17 ++---
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
Since git can intelligently emit diff hunk headers based on the
programming language of each file, assuming that the language is
specified in .gitattributes, it makes sense to specify our own
language (cpp) in our own .gitattributes file.
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
For filtering commits by function name, it's useful to identify the
function name in cases such as adding a new function to a file (where
the default functionality will not emit a function name in the hunk
header, because it isn't part of
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
For filtering by function names, it's useful to split hunks whenever a
function line is encountered, so that each function name being deleted
or inserted gets its own hunk header (which then can be easily detected
by the filter).
This
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 27.03.2014 18:16, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
I just found a failure to checkout a project with submodules where
there is no explicit submodule branch configuration, and the
submodules
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 02:50:46PM -0400, David A. Dalrymple (and Bhushan G.
Lodha) wrote:
This series introduces a --function-name=pattern option for git-log,
intended
to search for commits which touch a function matching a certain pattern (a
feature we've seen requested and are interested
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us writes:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 27.03.2014 18:16, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
I just found a failure to checkout a project with submodules where
there is no explicit submodule
+stefanbeller
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:48:11AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov k...@navytux.spb.ru writes:
(please keep author email)
8
From: Kirill Smelkov k...@mns.spb.ru
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:21:46 +0400
Subject: [PATCH v3a] tree-diff: rework diff_tree
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Victor Kartashov
victor.kartas...@gmail.com wrote:
shows gpg signature (if any) for commit message in gitweb
in case of successfully verifying the signature highlights it with green
Write in imperative mood: Show gpg ... highlight it...
As a corollary, would
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:39:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us writes:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 27.03.2014 18:16, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
I just found a failure to
I'm breaking this off into a sub-thread, so it doesn't distract from
the main issue.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:39:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
There is this bit for update in git-submodule.txt:
For updates that clone missing submodules, checkout-mode updates
will create submodules
The transition from submodule.path.* to submodule.name.* happened
in 73b0898d (Teach git submodule add the --name option, 2012-09-30),
which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03. The first
submodule.path.branch reference landed a short time later in
b9289227 (submodule add: If --branch is given,
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us writes:
[side note] Isn't that a typo of submodule.name.branch?
Good catch.
The transition from submodule.path.* to submodule.name.* happened
in 73b0898d (Teach git submodule add the --name option, 2012-09-30),
which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03.
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Christian Couder chrisc...@tuxfamily.org writes:
Yeah, but it seems a bit wasteful to allocate memory for a new string,
then downcase it, then compare it with strcmp() and then free it,
instead of just using strcasecmp() on the original string.
I
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 03:16:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I wasn't looking at the caller (and I haven't). I agree that, if
you have to compare case-insensitive user input against known set of
tokens, using strcasecmp() would be saner than making a downcased
copy and the set of
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
All bool config values allow tRuE.
I was expecting somebody will bring it up, but think about it. Bool
is a very special case. Even among CS folks, depending on your
background, true may be True may be TRUE may be 1.
Conflating it with some random enum does
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:46:16PM +, Charles Bailey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 05:57:41PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Hmm, so the year you got is actually: 1623969404. That still seems off
to me by a factor 20. I don't know if this is really worth digging into
that much further, but I
Am 27.03.2014 19:30, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 27.03.2014 16:52, schrieb W. Trevor King:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 03:21:49PM +0100, Johan Herland wrote:
I just found a failure to checkout a project with submodules where
there is no explicit submodule
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 03:47:01PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Actually, I think it ends up being hostile to the users to accept
random cases without a good reason. If you see two trailer elements
whose where are specified as after and AFTER in somebody's
configuration file, wouldn't that
Am 27.03.2014 21:27, schrieb Heiko Voigt:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:39:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us writes:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 27.03.2014 18:16, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:16:47PM +0100, Maurice Bos wrote:
I have no clue why git diff --cached isn't used instead of git diff-index.
I was wondering about it, but I decided I don't know enough about git and
there are probably valid reasons for doing it this way. Though, replacing
it with
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:37:07AM -0300, Thiago Farina wrote:
Do we leak the context we allocate in imap-send.c:280 intentionally?
It was never mentioned on the mailing list when the patches came
originally, so I suspect is just an omission.
Presumably the SSL_CTX is needed by the connection
Am 27.03.2014 22:06, schrieb W. Trevor King:
The transition from submodule.path.* to submodule.name.* happened
in 73b0898d (Teach git submodule add the --name option, 2012-09-30),
which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03.
Nope, the distinction between path and name is way older (AFAIK it
is
(Thanks to all of you for picking this up and more or less resolving
it while I was away from email for a few hours...)
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Heiko Voigt hvo...@hvoigt.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:39:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us writes:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de wrote:
Am 27.03.2014 19:30, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
- For a repository that does not have that branch thing
configured, the doc says that it will default to 'master'.
I do not think this was brought up during the
Hello.
As this is my first post to this list, let me first thank all the
people involved in Git development - it's really a great tool.
Now to the point. Since Git 1.8 (I think), git commit command honours
the submodules' ignore settings, configured either in .gitmodules, or
in .git/config.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
Verify that patch ID is now stable against hunk reordering.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
---
t/t4204-patch-id.sh | 68
+
1 file changed, 63
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:50 PM, David A. Dalrymple (and Bhushan G.
Lodha) dad-...@mit.edu wrote:
From: Bhushan Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: David Dalrymple (on zayin) davi...@alum.mit.edu
---
Documentation/diff-options.txt | 9 +
Hi,
I found git sometimes can't detect working trees changes. But I can
only reproduce this problem on several specific files, unfortunately
these files are copyrighted source files so I can't send them to you.
Is there anything I can do to narrow the problem and finally reproduce
the bug without
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
---
On 28/03/2014 07:45, yun sheng wrote:
Hi,
I found git sometimes can't detect working trees changes. But I can
only reproduce this problem on several specific files, unfortunately
these files are copyrighted source files so I can't send them to you.
Is there anything I can do to narrow the
Hi,
yun sheng wrote:
these two files have the same timestamp, the same size, bug slightly
different contents.
How did they get the same timestamp?
[...]
Git I'm using is msysgit 1.9.0 on windows 7
Unixy operating systems have other fields like inode number and ctime
that make it possible
-- Forwarded message --
From: yun sheng uew...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: Found a bug in git 1.9.0 but can't reproduce it without
copyrighted source code.
To: Trần Ngọc Quân vnwild...@gmail.com
The result of sha1sum is different. Following is my
The files get the same timestamp by using `git difftool -d` to view
diffs, the diff tool I use id beyond compare 3, this command would
generate temp files to feed the compare program, so these files get
the same time stamp, I copied them out from the temp folder.
I have no idea of the second
(cc-ing msysgit list, where there are more Windows-knowledgeable people)
yun sheng wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
yun sheng wrote:
these two files have the same timestamp, the same size, bug slightly
different contents.
How did they get the
The problem is I can't reproduce this bug if create some other files
which have the same size and timestamp. It only happens on several
files in my project. And it's even more frustrating that I can't send
these files to the mailing list since it is a proprietary source file.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:15:00AM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 27.03.2014 22:06, schrieb W. Trevor King:
The transition from submodule.path.* to submodule.name.* happened
in 73b0898d (Teach git submodule add the --name option, 2012-09-30),
which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:55:21PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Me thinks that when a superproject doesn't have 'branch' configured
and does set 'update' to something other than 'checkout' for a
submodule it should better make sure 'master' is a valid branch in
there. Everything else sounds like
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:21:23AM +0100, Johan Herland wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Heiko Voigt wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:39:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
There is this bit for update in git-submodule.txt:
For updates that clone missing submodules, checkout-mode
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Ilya Bobyr ilya.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
Allow better control of the set of tests that will be executed for a
single test suite. Mostly useful while debugging or developing as it
allows to focus on a specific test.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Bobyr ilya.bo...@gmail.com
gitmodule(5) mentioned 'master' as the default remote branch, but
folks using checkout-style updates are unlikely to care which upstream
branch their commit comes from (they only care that the clone fetches
that commit). If they haven't set submodule.name.branch, it makes
more sense to mirror
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:36 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
gitmodule(5) mentioned 'master' as the default remote branch, but
folks using checkout-style updates are unlikely to care which upstream
branch their commit comes from (they only care that the clone fetches
that commit).
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:43:47PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:36 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
submodule.name.branch::
A remote branch name for tracking updates in the upstream submodule.
- If the option is not specified, it defaults
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
Subject: ls: add -1 short for --no-column in the spirit of GNU ls
The -1 option is POSIX [1]; not a GNU extension.
[1]: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/ls.html
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:52:55PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:43:47PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:36 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
submodule.name.branch::
A remote branch name for tracking updates in the
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
With the current show_files() ls -tcm will show
foo.c
M foo.c
The first item is redundant. If foo.c is modified, we know it's in
the cache. Introduce show_files_compact to do that because ls-files is
plumbing
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
