During the mail thread about Pull is mostly evil a user asked how
the first parent could become reversed.
This howto explains how the first parent can get reversed when viewed
by the project and then explains a method to keep the history correct.
Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smith isch...@cox.net
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 07:58:13PM -0500, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
There hasn't been any real activity on it since 2010.
Plus there are better out-of-tree tools.
No tests and no real documentation either.
ACK, git clone hg::... is what one is supposed to use
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
That being said, storing abstract syntax tree, instead of raw object in git.
But that goes too far...
well, there are the clean/smudge filters, you can have it run everything through
a prettyprinter as it's checked in.
with a little effort, you could
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
On 03.05.2014 05:40, Felipe Contreras wrote:
That's very interesting. Do you get similar improvements when doing
something similar in Merurial (watchman vs . no watchman).
I have not tried it. My understanding is that this is why Facebook
Eric Wong wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No updates since 2010, and no tests.
Who benefits from this removal? Is this causing a maintenance
burden for Junio?
It is cruft that nobody uses and we are not even testing.
Plus, foreign SCM tools should live
William Giokas wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:36:29PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
William Giokas wrote:
E401: Multi-line imports seems like something that would just be
changing one line
Yes, and make the code very annoying.
It's 1 extra line in git-remote-hg, and 4 lines in
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
I'd actually be inclined to say the opposite of what Junio is saying
there: that -b should blank the author field as well as the commit
sha1. I'd even go so far as to say that -b should probably be the
default when boundary commits are in use. I cannot think of
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:18:54AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
William Giokas wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:36:29PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
William Giokas wrote:
E401: Multi-line imports seems like something that would just be
changing one line
Yes, and make the
William Giokas wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:18:54AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
William Giokas wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:36:29PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
William Giokas wrote:
E401: Multi-line imports seems like something that would just be
changing one
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
The rev (not revs) seems to be used by more things than the
final commit-tree state. Are we losing some useful information by
peeling it too early like this patch does? (...)
You're not wrong, actually, peeling at the last minute (or at least
later)
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:35:34AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
William Giokas wrote:
Yeah. In fact, for the mercurial stuff the `from mercurial import
changegroup`
line should be on the same line as the other `from mercurial import ...`
line.
I think the line is too big, it should
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No activity since 2010, no documentation, no tests.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
contrib/buildsystems/Generators.pm| 42 --
contrib/buildsystems/Generators/QMake.pm
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:54:29PM -0500, William Giokas wrote:
So I have been looking into the python code in the git tree recently
(contrib and core tree) and noticed that almost none of the files fully
conform to pep8. Now I'm not just saying this because I like the code to
be clean,
BugLink: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747068
--bcc should have higher priority than sendemail.bcc.
--bcc=address
Specify a Bcc: value for each email. Default is the value of
sendemail.bcc.
The --bcc option must be repeated for each user you want on the bcc list.
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No activity since 2010, no documentation, no tests.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
contrib/buildsystems/Generators.pm| 42 --
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Wong wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No updates since 2010, and no tests.
Who benefits from this removal? Is this causing a maintenance
burden for Junio?
It is cruft that nobody uses and we are not
David Kågedal wrote:
What problem does this removal solve?
Please do not top post.
a) What problem does it solve by staying?
b) Where are the tests?
c) Why it cannot be moved to an outside repository like may other
git-related tools?
2014-05-09 2:58 GMT+02:00 Felipe Contreras
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No activity since 2010, no documentation, no tests.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
Eric Wong wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Wong wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No updates since 2010, and no tests.
Who benefits from this removal? Is this causing a maintenance
burden for Junio?
It is cruft that
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want this script to remain in contrib, please:
a) Write at least a few tests
b) Write some documentation
c) Explain why it cannot live outside the git.git repository like
David Kågedal wrote:
2014-05-09 10:29 GMT+02:00 Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com:
David Kågedal wrote:
What problem does this removal solve?
Please do not top post.
a) What problem does it solve by staying?
b) Where are the tests?
c) Why it cannot be moved to
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
As a minimal token that anybody might possibly be using it, I would like
to see it work at least once. Since you said you have arch repos, can
you confirm that it does something?
Those repos are in offline/offsite storage and I do not have
Hi,
this test was disabled up to 1.9.2 so it did not fail as it did not run
by default.
I have set the variable to run and got an error also in previous
version, while never had problem in use.
So I simply go on as there will no worst than before.
It seems that no one is interested to this
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want this script to remain in contrib, please:
a) Write at least a few tests
b) Write
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want this script to remain in contrib, please:
a) Write at least a few tests
b) Write some documentation
c) Explain
Eric Wong wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
As a minimal token that anybody might possibly be using it, I would like
to see it work at least once. Since you said you have arch repos, can
you confirm that it does something?
Those repos are in offline/offsite
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want this script to remain in contrib, please:
a) Write at
David Kastrup wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Besides, you say No activity since 2010 - this is not the case,
bc380fc is from November 2013.
You think changing the execution bit of a file is considered activity?
For an indication of this software has actual
How can I get Bash v4 for msysgit 1.9.2? I need it for 'globstar'
shopt support. Thanks in advance.
Unfortunately you can't.
Newer bash versions don't work with the current msys layer.
See http://mingw.5.n7.nabble.com/bash-4-x-for-MSYS-td5605.html for a
more in depth discussion.
--
To
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
The idea of removing software from distribution is to get rid of
stuff without a user base rather than punishing lazy developers.
No.
So we have you on record that you would want to get rid of stuff _with_
a user base
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:18:44PM -0700, Shawn Pearce wrote:
The read penalty is not addressed here, so I still pay 14MB hashing
cost. But that's an easy problem. We could cache the validated index
in a daemon. Whenever git needs to load an index, it pokes the daemon.
The daemon verifies
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
No chance of ever graduating.
I see no relationship between the chance of graduating and the removal
from contrib/.
If you want to remove mw-to-git from contrib, then a good starting point
would be to explain why you want to do so in the
David Kastrup wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
The idea of removing software from distribution is to get rid of
stuff without a user base rather than punishing lazy developers.
No.
So we have you on record that you would want to get
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Felipe Contreras
You think changing the execution bit of a file is considered activity?
Well, now we're getting into
Matthieu Moy wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
No chance of ever graduating.
I see no relationship between the chance of graduating and the removal
from contrib/.
Read contrib/README.
If you want to remove mw-to-git from contrib, then a good starting point
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
The idea of removing software from distribution is to get rid of
stuff without a user base rather than punishing lazy developers.
No.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Felipe Contreras
You think changing the
On 09.05.2014 12:59, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Matthieu Moy wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
No chance of ever graduating.
I see no relationship between the chance of graduating and the removal
from contrib/.
Read contrib/README.
If you want to remove mw-to-git
Thanks for the info. Really quite disappointing that the discussion
linked was from 3 years ago but still no progress. I wish I could use
cygwin to use GIT but LESS doesn't work for log, reflog, and other
commands.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Thomas Braun
thomas.br...@virtuell-zuhause.de
For discussing these larger changes in the first version you may want to use
the -D option of git format-patch?
2014-05-09 4:01 GMT+02:00 Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com:
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
wrote:
It is serious.
The purpose of the 'contrib/' area is not clear. The statemens coming
from Junio don't match what is on 'contrib/README'. So we have a huge
variance of quality all over 'contrib/'. Some tools in contrib have
higher quality than what is part of the core (e.g. they have tests,
On May 8, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Stephen P. Smith isch...@cox.net wrote:
During the mail thread about Pull is mostly evil a user asked how
the first parent could become reversed.
This howto explains how the first parent can get reversed when viewed
by the project and then explains a method
Stefan Beller wrote:
It is serious.
The purpose of the 'contrib/' area is not clear. The statemens coming
from Junio don't match what is on 'contrib/README'. So we have a huge
variance of quality all over 'contrib/'. Some tools in contrib have
higher quality than what is part of the
Hi,
git-remote-hg is a bidirectional bridge between Git and Mercurial. It is
production-ready, has been widely tested, and was previously part of
git.git.
Junio C Hamano has retracted from his previous statements where he
wanted these tools to become part of the Git core and distributed by
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
David Kågedal dav...@lysator.liu.se writes:
2014-05-09 10:29 GMT+02:00 Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com:
David Kågedal wrote:
What problem does this removal solve?
Please do not top post.
a) What problem
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 04:20:40AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Eric Wong wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
As a minimal token that anybody might possibly be using it, I would like
to see it work at least once. Since you said you have arch repos, can
you
On 05/09/2014 02:58 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
No tests. No chance of ever graduating.
Already out-of-tree.
Cc: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
Thank you for your input.
git-multimail is maintained outside of the Git
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
On 05/09/2014 02:58 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
No tests. No chance of ever graduating.
Already out-of-tree.
Cc: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
Thank you for your input.
David Kågedal dav...@lysator.liu.se writes:
2014-05-09 10:29 GMT+02:00 Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com:
David Kågedal wrote:
What problem does this removal solve?
Please do not top post.
a) What problem does it solve by staying?
b) Where
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No activity since 2010, no tests.
Cc: Tim Henigan tim.heni...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
contrib/diffall/README | 31 --
contrib/diffall/git-diffall |
Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 04:20:40AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Eric Wong wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
As a minimal token that anybody might possibly be using it, I would like
to see it work at least once. Since you said you have arch
Michael Haggerty wrote:
On 05/09/2014 02:58 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
No tests. No chance of ever graduating.
Already out-of-tree.
Cc: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
Thank you for your input.
git-multimail is
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:12:36PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 07:58:18PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
No activity, no tests.
Like diff-highlight, I don't think no activity is a useful indicator.
I use this daily, and several people
Tim Henigan wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
wrote:
No activity since 2010, no tests.
Cc: Tim Henigan tim.heni...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
contrib/diffall/README | 31 --
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:01:32PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Are you planning on CC'ing the (inactive) authors/maintainers
so they know that if they care they should host those elsewhere?
They are already Cc'ed.
I don't think you were very thorough on this. Of the three remaining
On 05/09/2014 05:04 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
On 05/09/2014 02:58 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
No tests. No chance of ever graduating.
Already out-of-tree.
Cc: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:04:05AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Arguably if the user explicitly limited the range, he knows what he's
looking at. Admittedly, I don't know offhand which options _will_
produce boundary commit indications: there may be some without explicit
range limitation, and
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 04:13:31PM +0800, Adam Lee wrote:
BugLink: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747068
--bcc should have higher priority than sendemail.bcc.
--bcc=address
Specify a Bcc: value for each email. Default is the value of
sendemail.bcc.
The
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:39:32AM +0200, Fabio D'Alfonso wrote:
this test was disabled up to 1.9.2 so it did not fail as it did not run by
default.
Yes, in v1.9.2 we turned on http tests to run by default, but only if we
could succeed in setting up the http server automatically (and if we
Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:01:32PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Are you planning on CC'ing the (inactive) authors/maintainers
so they know that if they care they should host those elsewhere?
They are already Cc'ed.
I don't think you were very thorough on this.
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:02:28AM +0200, Fabio D'Alfonso wrote:
this is the error in httpd error.log
[Wed May 07 20:44:10 2014] [alert] getpwuid: couldn't determine user name
from uid 4294967295, you probably need to modify the User directive
[Wed May 07 20:44:10 2014] [notice]
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:44:02AM -0500, William Giokas wrote:
Maybe a time to use something like::
from mercurial import foo \
bar \
baz \
...
Would make that import into quite a few lines, but would help
Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:12:36PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 07:58:18PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
No activity, no tests.
Like diff-highlight, I don't think no activity is a useful indicator.
I use this
W. Trevor King wrote:
The indentation for the closing parenthesis is optional [2]. You can
of course do things like:
from mercurial import (
bar, baz,
foo,
)
I prefer:
from mercurial foo, bar, ...
from mercurial baz, ...
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 11:45:09AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 04:13:31PM +0800, Adam Lee wrote:
BugLink: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747068
--bcc should have higher priority than sendemail.bcc.
--bcc=address
Specify a Bcc: value for
Hi,
git-remote-bzr is a bidirectional bridge between Git and Bazaar. It is
production-ready, has been widely tested, and was previously part of
git.git.
As I already explained[1], there is no path forward for git-remote-hg
and git-remote-bzr; Junio C Hamano has retracted from his previous
Felipe Contreras wrote:
All right, I guess that' something, but I get:
Use of each() on hash after insertion without resetting hash iterator
results in undefined behavior, Perl interpreter: 0x1fec010 at
/usr/lib/git-core/git-archimport line 129.
And a ton of:
WARNING: no rule
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael Haggerty wrote:
What's more, it has a maintainer who doesn't routinely insult other
people on the mailing list,
Aaand skiping the rest. Good bye.
Aww, Felipe, it's no fair when you ignore other people's
slag. How ever will anyone argue
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 07:58:30PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
No activity since 2012, no tests, no chance of ever graduating.
I don't think no activity is an interesting indicator. This tool _is_
actively maintained, but it has not needed any fixes since
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
I already explained:
That's right, and they are Cc'ed so they can respond. Some tools have
only one commit or two, and in those I didn't even bother Cc'ing
anyone.
contrib/persistent-https consist of a
Michael Haggerty wrote:
On 04/26/2014 01:19 AM, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 03:50:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[...]
* fc/publish-vs-upstream (2014-04-21) 8 commits
- sha1_name: add support for @{publish} marks
- sha1_name: simplify track finding
- sha1_name:
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
I already explained:
That's right, and they are Cc'ed so they can respond. Some tools have
only one commit or two, and in those I didn't even bother Cc'ing
anyone.
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
I already said this multiple times, but let me be clear once more:
MASTER HAS A REGRESSION (for all versions of Mercurial).
As you said, that is not a
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 00:08 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
On 03.05.2014 05:40, Felipe Contreras wrote:
That's very interesting. Do you get similar improvements when doing
something similar in Merurial (watchman vs . no watchman).
I have not
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:04:05AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Arguably if the user explicitly limited the range, he knows what he's
looking at. Admittedly, I don't know offhand which options _will_
produce boundary commit indications: there may be some
Hi,
yes, the problem comes from root. I made a make test using git user in
my 12.04 server where there is a gitlab and the test went on for 5539.
I think the 3 could be the better solution.
This is not the place to discuss about the sudo mania, a disease I did
not get and hope not to get, but
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
And speaking of wasted time, I do not plan on responding further to you
in this thread. I am telling you ahead of time that this is the case,
because elsewhere[1] I saw you complaining that Junio did not respond to
your emails, which you seemed to think was
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net writes:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No updates since 2010, and no tests.
Who benefits from this removal? Is this causing a maintenance
burden for Junio?
No. See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/248587
Plus,
Junio C Hamano wrote:
There is no prove yourself is worthy or get evicted purge going on
in the contrib/ area. I saw contrib/README referred to a few times
in the near-by threads, and I think these patches are done primarily
by deliberately misinterpreting one part of it in order to grab
From: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
On 04/26/2014 01:19 AM, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 03:50:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[...]
* fc/publish-vs-upstream (2014-04-21) 8 commits
- sha1_name: add support for @{publish} marks
- sha1_name: simplify track finding
-
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net writes:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No updates since 2010, and no tests.
Who benefits from this removal? Is this causing a maintenance
burden for Junio?
No. See
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:18:44PM -0700, Shawn Pearce wrote:
The read penalty is not addressed here, so I still pay 14MB hashing
cost. But that's an easy problem. We could cache the validated index
in a daemon. Whenever git needs to load an index, it
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
*You* said this[1]:
If you read the context you omitted from the quote, and realize that
it was a counter-suggestion to give a middle ground to a more
draconian let's divide them into two, neither which I said I want
to see go forward
On Fri, 9 May 2014, David Turner wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 00:08 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
On 03.05.2014 05:40, Felipe Contreras wrote:
That's very interesting. Do you get similar improvements when doing
something similar in Merurial
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 11:08 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2014, David Turner wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 00:08 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
On 03.05.2014 05:40, Felipe Contreras wrote:
That's very interesting. Do you get similar
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
*You* said this[1]:
If you read the context you omitted from the quote, and realize that
it was a counter-suggestion to give a middle ground to a more
draconian let's divide them into two, neither which I said I
On Fri, 9 May 2014, David Turner wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 11:08 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2014, David Turner wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 00:08 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
On 03.05.2014 05:40, Felipe Contreras wrote:
That's
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
*You* said this[1]:
If you read the context you omitted from the quote, and realize that
it was a counter-suggestion to give a middle ground to a more
draconian
Hi,
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
Please don't. This script is useful to build with the MSVC IDE, which
enables us to use their excellent debugger.
If you want this script to remain in
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
*You* said this[1]:
If you read the context you omitted from the quote, and realize that
it was a counter-suggestion to give a
On 9 May 2014 18:52, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Such incredible double standards.
I think I speak for everyone when I say: fuck off.
I'm sick and tired of seeing you pop up here with polemic and
rhetoric, publicly outing those who are making Git great, just because
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 11:27 -0700, David Lang wrote:
That's not my understanding from Durham Goode's talk in January. Yes,
operations involving history go to the server. But the client also
maintains a copy of the working tree, and it is for this that watchman
is used. Otherwise, why
Hi Tim,
Tim Henigan wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
contrib/diffall/README | 31 --
contrib/diffall/git-diffall | 257
2 files changed, 288 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
There is no guideline as for what should be part of contrib.
Some tools are actively maintained, others consist of a single commit.
Some tools have active user-base, some aren't used by anyone. Some tools
are on the path towards the core, others will never get there. Some
tools are already
The contrib area is full of accumulatted cruft. Let's remove what is not used
and what is already maintained externay.
Felipe Contreras (17):
contrib: remove outdated README
contrib: remove 'vim'
contrib: remove 'emacs'
contrib: remove 'diffall'
contrib: remove 'hg-to-git'
contrib:
There are only instructions for old versions of vim (7.2) which don't
apply since six years.
The vast majority of people don't need these instructions.
Let's remove them.
Cc: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com
Cc: Jeff King p...@peff.net
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
There hasn't been any real activity on it since 2010.
Plus there are better out-of-tree tools.
No tests and no real documentation either.
Cc: Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
contrib/hg-to-git/hg-to-git.py | 255
There is no more need for this tool since the --dir-dirr option was
introduced.
Cc: Tim Henigan tim.heni...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
contrib/diffall/README | 31 --
contrib/diffall/git-diffall | 257
No activity, no tests.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
contrib/thunderbird-patch-inline/README | 20
contrib/thunderbird-patch-inline/appp.sh | 55
2 files changed, 75 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
