I have a non-bare repository /home/a set up with an alternate to the
bare repository /b. Running git gc on /home/a produces below's error
error: unable to open
/b/objects/56/b969ffdf64343777a069260f41761dc0551bfa/00: Not a directory
The referenced file
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Ephrim Khong dr.kh...@gmail.com wrote:
Without having looked into this and nd/multiple-work-trees, but with make
multiple checkouts aware of each other in mind: Could this mechanism be
re-used to make alternates aware of each other, to mitigate the dangers of
Paul Tan writes:
I would like to share this very rough prototype with everyone.
...
I started this as a just-for-fun exercise to learn about the git internal
API
I started to rewrite git-pull for similar reasons a couple of months ago,
but I haven't had time to complete it. It looks like my
---
builtin/checkout.c | 40 +++-
builtin/merge.c| 29 +++--
unpack-trees.c | 33 +
unpack-trees.h | 4
4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/checkout.c
---
Makefile | 2 +-
git-rebase--merge.sh (mode +x) | 34 ++
git-rebase.sh | 2 ++
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
mode change 100644 = 100755 git-rebase--merge.sh
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index
git-rebase.sh is no longer a dependency for rebase subscripts. This
function is only used by subscripts only, which now becomes useless.
---
git-rebase.sh | 13 -
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh
index 86119e7..d941239 100755
---
---
Makefile| 2 +-
builtin.h | 1 +
builtin/rebase.c (new) | 752
commit.c| 4 +-
commit.h| 4 +-
---
git-rebase--am.sh | 5 +
git-rebase--interactive.sh | 5 +
git-rebase--merge.sh | 5 +
git-rebase.sh | 7 +--
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-rebase--am.sh b/git-rebase--am.sh
index ab84330..399956b 100755
---
---
builtin/blame.c | 4 ++--
builtin/commit.c | 16 +---
builtin/merge.c | 3 +--
builtin/notes.c | 4 ++--
builtin/tag.c| 7 ++-
strbuf.c | 8
strbuf.h | 1 +
7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/blame.c
---
Makefile | 2 +-
git-rebase--interactive.sh (mode +x) | 36 +++-
git-rebase.sh| 9 ++---
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
mode change 100644 = 100755 git-rebase--interactive.sh
diff
---
Makefile| 2 +-
git-rebase--am.sh (mode +x) | 34 ++
git-rebase.sh | 11 ++-
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mode change 100644 = 100755 git-rebase--am.sh
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index
It would help if you pasted the push output. For example, does it stop
at 20% at the compressing objects line or writing objects. How
many total objects does it say?
It rattles through compressing objects, and the first 20% of
writing objects, then slows to a crawl.
Writing objects: 33%
My $0.02 based on $dayjob
(disclaimer I've never used subtree)
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Robert Dailey
rcdailey.li...@gmail.com wrote:
At my workplace, the team is using Atlassian Stash + git
We have a Core library that is our common code between various
projects. To avoid a single
Teaching reset the - shorthand involves checking if any file named '-' exists.
check_filename() is used to perform this check.
When the @{-1} branch does not exist then it can be safely assumed that the
user is referring to the file '-',if any. If this file exists then it is reset
or else
a bad
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Thank you for doing it. I was about to write another number parser and
you did it :D Maybe you can add another patch to convert the only
strtol in upload-pack.c to parse_ui. This place should accept positive
number
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Graham Hay grahamr...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a fairly large repo (~2.4GB), mainly due to binary resources
(for an ios app). I know this can generally be a problem, but I have a
specific question.
If I cut a branch, and edit a few (non-binary) files, and
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:33:54PM +, Bharat Suvarna wrote:
Hi
I am trying to find a way of using version control on PLC programmers like
Allen Bradley PLC. I can't find a way of this.
Could you please give me an idea if it will work with Plc programs. Which are
basically Ladder
Hi Stephen,
On 2015-03-18 09:38, Stephen Robin wrote:
Paul Tan writes:
I would like to share this very rough prototype with everyone.
...
I started this as a just-for-fun exercise to learn about the git internal
API
I started to rewrite git-pull for similar reasons a couple of months ago,
In the spirit of sharing code proactively [1], despite my embarrassment,
this is what I got for converting git-rebase.sh to C. Note that this
is only about git-rebase.sh, not git-rebase--*.sh. Some changes in
git-rebase.sh are pushed back to git-rebase--*.sh. The idea is we
convert git-rebase.sh
On 03/18/2015 11:03 AM, Jeff King wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:47:40AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
But in case you have some reason that you want upload-pack.c to be
converted right away, I just pushed that change (plus some related
cleanups) to my GitHub repo [1]. The branch depends
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 03:54:02PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
But it strikes me as weird that we consider the _tips_ of history to be
special for ignoring breakage. If the tip of bar is broken, we omit
it. But if the tip is fine, and there's breakage
On 03/18/2015 12:05 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
wrote:
Michael Haggerty (14):
numparse: new module for parsing integral numbers
cacheinfo_callback(): use convert_ui() when handling --cacheinfo
write_subdirectory(): use
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:47:40AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
But in case you have some reason that you want upload-pack.c to be
converted right away, I just pushed that change (plus some related
cleanups) to my GitHub repo [1]. The branch depends only on the first
patch of the numparse
The failure case which occurs on teaching git is taught the '-' shorthand
is when there exists no branch pointed to by '@{-1}'. But, if there is a file
named - in the working tree, the user can be unambiguously assumed to be
referring to it while issuing this command.
The ambiguous case occurs
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:11:48AM +0100, Ephrim Khong wrote:
I have a non-bare repository /home/a set up with an alternate to the bare
repository /b. Running git gc on /home/a produces below's error
[...]
git --version
git version 2.3.0
Try v2.3.2. It has b0a4264 (sha1_file: fix
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, but the user is supposed to not
We have a fairly large repo (~2.4GB), mainly due to binary resources
(for an ios app). I know this can generally be a problem, but I have a
specific question.
If I cut a branch, and edit a few (non-binary) files, and push, what
should be uploaded? I assumed it was just the diff (I know whole
Without having looked into this and nd/multiple-work-trees, but with
make multiple checkouts aware of each other in mind: Could this
mechanism be re-used to make alternates aware of each other, to mitigate
the dangers of having git gc on an alternate remove objects that are
used by a
Hi Paul,
thank you for this very detailed mail. It was a real pleasure to read this
well-researched document.
In the following, I will pick out only parts from the mail, in the interest of
both of our time. Please assume that I agree with everything that I do not
quote below (and even the
Hello,
I have a local folder with the git-repository (so that its .git/config
contains ([remote origin]\n url = git://github.com/git/git.git\nfetch
= +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* )
I do there git pull.
Usually the output is
Already up to date
but since today it prints
Auto
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Graham Hay grahamr...@gmail.com wrote:
It would help if you pasted the push output. For example, does it stop
at 20% at the compressing objects line or writing objects. How
many total objects does it say?
It rattles through compressing objects, and the first
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
It's quite a lot of work :) I created this script named git and put
it in $PATH to capture input for pack-objects. You'll need to update
/path/to/real/git to point to the real binary then you'll get
/tmp/stdin
Forgot one
Are there any commands that I can use to show exactly what it is trying to push?
I'll see if I can create a (public) repo that has the same problem.
Thanks for your help.
This 10804 looks wrong (i.e. sending that many compressed objects).
Also 80 MiB sent at that point. If you modify just a
If a user does git checkout HEAD -- path/to/submodule they'd expect the
submodule to be checked out to the commit that submodule is at in HEAD.
This is the most brute force possible way of try to do that, and so its
probably broken in some cases. However I'm not terribly familiar with
git's
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Graham Hay grahamr...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any commands that I can use to show exactly what it is trying to
push?
It's a bit more than a command. If you push when GIT_TRACE is set to
2, you'll see it executes git pack-objects command with all its
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:05:45AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
The offending one came from eec3e7e4 (cache-tree: invalidate i-t-a
paths after generating trees, 2012-12-16), which
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Graham Hay grahamr...@gmail.com wrote:
I created a repo with over 1GB of images, but it works as expected
(only pushed 3 objects).
Sorry, I must have done something wrong. I put that script in
~/Applications, and checked it worked. Then I ran this:
$
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 05:13:25PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
Hi,
git-verify-pack's man page says the following about --stat-only:
Do not verify
On 18.03.2015 10:42, Jeff King wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:11:48AM +0100, Ephrim Khong wrote:
I have a non-bare repository /home/a set up with an alternate to the bare
repository /b. Running git gc on /home/a produces below's error
[...]
git --version
git version 2.3.0
Try v2.3.2.
I created a repo with over 1GB of images, but it works as expected
(only pushed 3 objects).
Sorry, I must have done something wrong. I put that script in
~/Applications, and checked it worked. Then I ran this:
$ GIT_TRACE=2 PATH=~/Applications:$PATH git push --set-upstream origin git-wtf
Hello,
# git gc --auto
Auto packing the repository in background for optimum performance.
See git help gc for manual housekeeping.
and calls in the background:
25618 1 0 32451 884 1 14:20 ?00:00:00 git gc --auto
25639 25618 51 49076 49428 0 14:20 ?00:00:07 git prune
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
If not, I made some mistake in analyzing this and we'll start again.
I did make one mistake, the first gc should have reduced the number
of loose objects to zero. Why didn't it.? I'll come back to this
tomorrow if nobody finds
Hello Duy,
#ls .git/objects/17/* | wc -l
30
30 * 256 = 7 680 6 700
And now? Do I have to run git gc --aggressive ?
Kind regards
Dilian
On 18.03.2015 15:33, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Дилян Палаузов
dilyan.palau...@aegee.org wrote:
Hello,
# git gc --auto
Auto
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Дилян Палаузов
dilyan.palau...@aegee.org wrote:
Hello,
I have a local folder with the git-repository (so that its .git/config
contains ([remote origin]\nurl = git://github.com/git/git.git\nfetch =
+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* )
I do there git
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Дилян Палаузов
dilyan.palau...@aegee.org wrote:
Hello,
# git gc --auto
Auto packing the repository in background for optimum performance.
See git help gc for manual housekeeping.
and calls in the background:
25618 1 0 32451 884 1 14:20 ?
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:41:59PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
If not, I made some mistake in analyzing this and we'll start again.
I did make one mistake, the first gc should have reduced the number
of loose objects to zero.
Got there eventually!
$ git verify-pack --verbose bar.pack
e13e21a1f49704ed35ddc3b15b6111a5f9b34702 commit 220 152 12
03691863451ef9db6c69493da1fa556f9338a01d commit 334 227 164
... snip ...
chain length = 50: 2 objects
bar.pack: ok
Now what do I do with it :)
On 18 March 2015 at 13:33, Duy
I would personnally prefer to see this squashed with PATCH 2/4: pushing
the bisectable history principle a bit, the state between patches 2
and 3 could be considered broken because the code does not do what the
documentation says. And as a reviewer, I like having pieces of docs
linked to the patch
Similarly to the merge doc and code, I personally prefer seeing code
and tests in the same patch.
Actually, my preference goes for a first patch that introduces the tests
with test_expect_failure for things that are not yet implemented (and
you can check that tests do not pass yet before you
Paul Tan pyoka...@gmail.com writes:
+ /* Write credential to the filename specified by fns-items[0], thus
+ * creating it */
Just to show I'm following: misformatted multi-line comment.
Other than that, good job!
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe
Sundararajan R dyou...@gmail.com writes:
Subject: [v3 PATCH 2/2] reset: add tests for git reset -
This should be [PATCH v3 2/2].
git send-email -v2 can do this for you.
Sundararajan R dyou...@gmail.com writes:
+test_expect_success 'reset - with no @{-1} branch and file named - should
It seems like submodule isn't picking up on the work tree that I'm
specifying. In the scenario that I'm working with, I'd prefer to not
have to cd into a directory to update the submodules. All the other
git subcommands that I'm executing work fine with specifying the git
dir and work tree via
Hi,
First of all, thanks a lot for working on this. I'm rather impressed to
see a working proof of concept so soon! And impressed by the quality for
a first draft.
A few minor remaks below after a very quick look.
Paul Tan pyoka...@gmail.com writes:
Ideally, I think the solution is to
Am 17.03.2015 um 19:55 schrieb Jeff King:
+ echo $bogus .git/refs/heads/bogus..name
...
I assumed the final . in your example wasn't significant (it is not to
git), but let me know if I've run afoul of another weird restriction. :)
It was actually deliberate (with intents too
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Alessandro Zanardi
pensierinmus...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are other sources describing the issue:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21109672/git-ignoring-icon-files-because-of-icon-rule
http://blog.bitfluent.com/post/173740409/ignoring-icon-in-gitignore
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Paul Tan pyoka...@gmail.com wrote:
t0302 now tests git-credential-store's support for the XDG user-specific
configuration file $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/credentials. Specifically:
---
The previous version can be found at [1].
[1]
Previously, git-credential-store only supported storing credentials in a
single file: ~/.git-credentials. In order to support the XDG base
directory specification[1], git-credential-store needs to be able to
lookup and erase credentials from multiple files, as well as to pick the
appropriate file
t0302 now tests git-credential-store's support for the XDG user-specific
configuration file $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/credentials. Specifically:
* Ensure that the XDG file is strictly opt-in. It should not be created
by git at all times if it does not exist.
* Conversely, if the XDG file exists,
Add $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/credentials to the default credential search
path of git-credential-store. This allows git-credential-store to
support user-specific configuration files in accordance with the XDG
base directory specification[1].
[1]
git-credential-store now supports an additional default credential file
at $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/credentials. However, ~/.git-credentials takes
precedence over it for backwards compatibility. To make the precedence
ordering explicit, add a new section FILES that lists out the credential
file paths
Kedves: Webmail Előfizető
Felhívjuk figyelmét, hogy az e-mail fiók meghaladta
tárolókapacitás. Ön nem tud küldeni és fogadni e-maileket és a
e-mail fiókja törlésre kerül a szerverünkről. A probléma elkerülése
érdekében,
Kattintson ide frissítse a számla.
http://mailhusite.jigsy.com/
A little late to this thread
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 03:28:57PM -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
The first is a question about git's basic policy with respect to things
like this. I hope that it's safe to assume that running 'git'
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca writes:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015, at 16:49, Junio C Hamano wrote:
With more recent versions of Git, namely, the versions after
30a52c1d (Merge branch 'ms/submodule-update-config-doc' into maint,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Chris Packham judge.pack...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca writes:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015, at 16:49, Junio C Hamano wrote:
With more recent versions of Git, namely, the
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Randall S. Becker
rsbec...@nexbridge.com wrote:
On March 17, 2015 7:34 PM, Bharat Suvarna wrote:
I am trying to find a way of using version control on PLC programmers like
Allen
Bradley PLC. I can't find a way of this.
Could you please give me an idea if it
On 03/18/2015 07:27 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Implement wrappers for strtol() and strtoul() that are safer and more
convenient to use.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
---
diff --git a/numparse.c
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 07:31:48AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Or we could count/estimate the number of loose objects again after
repack/prune. Then we can maybe have a way to prevent the next gc that
we know will not improve the situation anyway. One option is pack
unreachable objects in the
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:27:22PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 07:31:48AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Or we could count/estimate the number of loose objects again after
repack/prune. Then we can maybe have a way to prevent the next gc that
we know will not improve the
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Keeping a file that says I ran gc at time T, and there were still N
objects left over is probably the best bet. When the next gc --auto
runs, if T is recent enough, subtract N from the estimated number of
objects. I'm not sure of
Paul Tan pyoka...@gmail.com writes:
+/* Global vars since they are used often */
+static char *head_name;
+static const char *head_name_short;
+static unsigned char head_sha1[20];
+static int head_flags;
+
+enum rebase_type {
+ REBASE_FALSE = 0,
+ REBASE_TRUE = 1,
+
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Chris Packham judge.pack...@gmail.com wrote:
My $0.02 based on $dayjob
(disclaimer I've never used subtree)
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Robert Dailey
rcdailey.li...@gmail.com wrote:
At my workplace, the team is using Atlassian Stash + git
We have a
On March 18, 2015 6:29 PM Doug Kelly wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Randall S. Becker
rsbec...@nexbridge.com wrote:
On March 17, 2015 7:34 PM, Bharat Suvarna wrote:
I am trying to find a way of using version control on PLC programmers
like
Allen
Bradley PLC. I can't find a way
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
Right. I missed this but I think this is a less important test
because I added a new test to make sure diff --cached (git
status to be exact) outputs the right thing when i-t-a entries
are present.
OK.
If on the other hand the tests show the same result
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:58:15PM +, John Keeping wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:41:59PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
If not, I made some mistake in
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 07:27:46PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I guess leaving a bunch of loose objects around longer than necessary
isn't the end of the world. It wastes space, but it does not actively
make the rest of git slower (whereas having a large number of packs does
impact
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:14:53AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01:17AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
I don't think packing the unreachables is a good plan. They just end up
accumulating then, and they never expire, because we keep refreshing
their mtime at each pack
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 05:00:02PM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
My main questions:
* Do people like the API? My main goal was to make these functions as
painless as possible to use correctly, because there are so many
call sites.
* Is it too gimmicky to encode the base together
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:15:19AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Keeping a file that says I ran gc at time T, and there were still N
objects left over is probably the best bet. When the next gc --auto
runs, if T is recent enough,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:15:19AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Keeping a file that says I ran gc at time T, and there were still N
objects left over is probably the
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:29:57AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
That omits the N objects left over information. Which I think may be
useful, because otherwise the rule is basically don't do another gc at
all for X time units. That's OK for most use, but it has its own corner
cases.
True.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01:17AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
I don't think packing the unreachables is a good plan. They just end up
accumulating then, and they never expire, because we keep refreshing
their mtime at each pack (unless you pack them once and then leave them
to expire, but
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Keeping a file that says I ran gc at time T, and there were still N
objects left over is probably the best bet. When the next gc --auto
runs, if T is recent enough, subtract N from the estimated number of
objects. I'm not sure of
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:03:30AM -0700, Spencer Nelson wrote:
If you’re in a shell in a directory which no longer exists (because,
say, another terminal removed it), then getcwd() will fail, at least
on OS X Yosemite 10.10.2. In this case, git clone will fail. That’s
totally reasonable.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 07:00:13PM +0100, Wilhelm Schuermann wrote:
When grep is called with the --quiet option, the pager is initialized
despite not being used. When the pager is less, anything output by
previous commands and not ended with a newline is overwritten.
[...]
This patch
When grep is called with the --quiet option, the pager is initialized
despite not being used. When the pager is less, anything output by
previous commands and not ended with a newline is overwritten.
$ echo -n aaa; echo bbb
aaabbb
$ echo -n aaa; git grep -q foo; echo bbb
bbb
This can be worked
If you’re in a shell in a directory which no longer exists (because, say,
another terminal removed it), then getcwd() will fail, at least on OS X
Yosemite 10.10.2. In this case, git clone will fail. That’s totally reasonable.
If you invoke git clone with the git clone repo dir syntax, then
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Implement wrappers for strtol() and strtoul() that are safer and more
convenient to use.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
---
diff --git a/numparse.c b/numparse.c
new file mode 100644
index
We do not usually end our errors with a full stop, but it
looks especially bad when you use die_errno, which adds a
colon, like:
fatal: could not create work tree dir 'foo'.: No such file or directory
Signed-off-by: Jeff King p...@peff.net
---
Not strictly related to the other patch, but I
On Wed, Mar 18 2015 at 04:29:44 AM, Sundararajan R dyou...@gmail.com wrote:
Teaching reset the - shorthand involves checking if any file named '-' exists.
check_filename() is used to perform this check.
When the @{-1} branch does not exist then it can be safely assumed that the
user is
On 03/18/2015 01:40 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] sha1_file: refactor sha1_file.c to support
'cat-file --literally'
Modify sha1_loose_object_info() to support 'cat-file --literally'
by accepting flags and also make
On March 17, 2015 7:34 PM, Bharat Suvarna wrote:
I am trying to find a way of using version control on PLC programmers like
Allen
Bradley PLC. I can't find a way of this.
Could you please give me an idea if it will work with Plc programs. Which
are
basically Ladder logic.
Many PLC programs
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
Similarly to the merge doc and code, I personally prefer seeing code
and tests in the same patch.
In this case, the patch introducing the tests is already quite long
and intricate, almost to the point of being a
This allows making submodules a linked workdirs.
Same as for .git, but ignores the GIT_COMMON_DIR environment variable,
because it would mean common directory for the parent repository and
does not make sense for submodule.
Also add test for functionality which uses this call.
Signed-off-by:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 05:17:16PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
[1] The double-CR fix works because we strip a single CR from the end of
the line (as a convenience for CRLF systems), and then the remaining
CR is syntactically significant. But I am surprised that quoting
like:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 05:17:16PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
[1] The double-CR fix works because we strip a single CR from the end of
the line (as a convenience for CRLF systems), and then the remaining
CR is syntactically
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
What does the Icon^M try to catch, exactly? Is it a file? Is it a directory?
Is it anything that begins with Icon^M?
It seems to be a special hidden file on Macs for UI convenience.
On Apr 25, 2005, at 6:21 AM, Peter N.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:58:15PM +, John Keeping wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:41:59PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
If not, I made some mistake in analyzing this and we'll start again.
I did make one mistake,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 03:48:42PM +0100, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
#ls .git/objects/17/* | wc -l
30
30 * 256 = 7 680 6 700
And now? Do I have to run git gc --aggressive ?
No, aggressive just controls the time we spend on repacking. If the
guess is correct that the objects are kept
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Alessandro Zanardi
pensierinmus...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are other sources describing the issue:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21109672/git-ignoring-icon-files-because-of-icon-rule
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:06:22PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
Where did you get that file from? We need to find whoever is
responsible and notify them so that these users who are having
the issue will be helped.
Given that this is part of https://github.com/github/gitignore
which is
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
