On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
So I think there are two possibilities for improving this:
1. Find places where we expect the object will not exist (like the
collision_test check you pointed out) and use a
has_sha1_file_fast that accepts that it may
On 07/05/15 23:16, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Luke Diamand l...@diamand.org writes:
[Resurrecting old thread]
Looking at run-command.c, GIT_WINDOES_NATIVE and POSIX seems to use
pretty much the same construct, except that they use SHELL_PATH
instead of sh.
I think the state of git on Windows
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 9:47 AM, McHenry, Matt
mmche...@carnegielearning.com wrote:
So maybe you can do GIT_TRACE=2 git svn fetch and post the output.
I'd expect to see something like git read-tree sha1 before fatal:
unorder You can then use git ls-tree sha1 to examine this tree,
try to
Luke Diamand l...@diamand.org writes:
diff --git a/t/t9813-git-p4-preserve-users.sh
b/t/t9813-git-p4-preserve-users.sh
index 166b840..fe65788 100755
--- a/t/t9813-git-p4-preserve-users.sh
+++ b/t/t9813-git-p4-preserve-users.sh
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ test_expect_success 'preserve users' '
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Having slept on it, I really think --seed should be fetch from the
seed into temp refs, and not what I posted earlier.
Yeah, I think that is the right way to do it.
And it happens to mesh well with the (not so well advertised but not
so well hidden) plan to
Thanks for working on this. I have one little bikeshedding comment...
On 05/21/2015 06:14 AM, Jeff King wrote:
[...]
There are a few open issues with this series:
1. Assuming that seed is a reasonable verb for this concept, is
--seed=repo OK for the option? Would --seed-from=repo be
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Dmitry Malikov wrote:
I'm trying to compare 4 different git-diff algorithms and the
'minimal' one is the most vague and non-obvious. The documentation
says Spend extra time to make sure the smallest possible diff is
produced. - that's all.
By any
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 08:19:03AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
The other problem is that I'm not sure stat data is enough to notice
when a directory changes. Certainly the mtime should change, but if you
have only one-second
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:00:06PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
I don't have any insight about whether mtimes are reliable change
indicators for directories.
But if you make this change, you are changing the contract of the
stat_validity functions:
* Have you verified that no callers
9 matches
Mail list logo
