hi folks,
I have a git server which gets pushes of data (not code) from a couple
hundred VMs every hour. Every round of pushes leaves two stray .keep
files, so I am guessing two clients are having problems completing the
push. The contents being pushed are reports of a puppet run.
Is there a
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a handy way to list the blobs in a pack, so I can feed them
to git-cat-file and see what's in there? I'm sure that'll help me
narrow down on the issue.
git show-index
/var/lib/ppg/reports.git/objects
Diagnosing errors with git over ssh has historically required tooling
up for debugging or looking at things from the client side, because
git does not log anything on the server side.
It would be a boon to those running busy git servers to be able to
diagnose by looking at a log. It can be both
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Martin Fick mf...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Perhaps the receiving process is dying hard and leaving
stuff behind? Out-of-memory, out of disk space?
Yes, that's my guess as well. This server had gc misconfigured, so it
hit ENOSPC a few weeks ago.
It is likely that
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
We'll need to output the error side bands to stderr
too in case side-band is used.
Agreed, we'd need to tee the output so it gets to the logger _and_ to stderr.
I thought perhaps daemon.c would have something in this spirit,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
We see these occasionally at GitHub, too. I haven't yet figured out a
definite cause, though whatever it is, it's relatively rare.
Do you have a cleanup script to safely get rid of stale .keep and
.lock files? I wonder what other
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
As long as we can reliably determine that it is safe to do so
without risking races, automatically cleaning .lock files is a good
thing to do.
If the .lock file is a day old, it seems to me that it should be safe
to call
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote:
# Install fedpkg
$ yum install fedpkg
fedpkg is amazing. I (ab)use it (and the associated build machinery)
for lots of private package builds.
# Create an el6 srpm
$ fedpkg --dist el6 srpm
here I just say fedpkg --dist el6
I have a shell script that trims old history on a cronjob. This is for
a repo that is used to track reports that have limited life (like
logs). Old history is trimmed with grafts pointing to an empty root
commit.
Right now, info/graft grows unbound. I am looking for a way to trim
unreachable
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Does git fsck --unreachable --no-reflogs help?
Well, my script, called regularly, does:
- adds grafts
- git repack -AFfd (which unpacks unreachable objects)
- git prune --expire now
hmm, I guess could prune the
Back in
http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/PATCH-0-2-Make-git-gc-more-robust-with-regard-to-grafts-td3310281.html
we got gc/repack to be safer for users who might be shooting
themselves in the foot.
Would a patch be welcome to add --discard-grafted-objects ? or
--keep-real-parents=idontthinkso ?
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Given that we in general frown upon long-term use of grafts (or
replace for that matter), I am not sure if we want to go in that
direction.
Just a knee-jerk reaction, though.
Fair enough.
If I state my actual goals --
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:56 PM, David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
there's also the issue of managed vs generated files, if you update the
mtime all the way up the tree because a source file was compiled and a
binary created, that will quickly defeat the value of the recursive mime.
I think this
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Let us be honest, the vast majority of tools in 'contrib/' have no chance of
ever graduating, so let's remove them.
I am curious -- have you checked what parts of contrib downstreams
packageship? Are you planning
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
I already explained:
That's right, and they are Cc'ed so they can respond. Some tools have
only one commit or two, and in those I didn't even bother Cc'ing
anyone.
contrib/persistent-https consist of a
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No updates since 2010, and no tests.
NAK.
IMHO, this is quite unfriendly.
Is this removal based on your opinion, or Junio's position (or
consensus from maintainers from the list)? If there is a clear
consensus
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
You are once more twisting the sequence of events.
Found this gem looking for background to the proposed removal to code of mine.
Felipe, if you are wanting to have a war of words with Junio, go have
it, with
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net writes:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
No updates since 2010, and no tests.
Who benefits from this removal? Is this causing a maintenance
burden for Junio?
No. See
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
This tool doesn't even work anyway.
It doesn't? Bug report / more info please?
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code
Felipe,
someone can contribute positively, and also be very destructive.
Your positive contributions, nobody will deny.
However, you have to tame the other part to be good company.
I have had patches and contributions rejected in the past, sometimes
rudely. Same has happened to many others, if
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
You are not paying attention at all.
Junio may have been trying to be polite and not tell you directly that
attitude was a factor. Whatever. He is the maintainer. Of all the
folks in this list, he gets to call
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we no longer have to be afraid of that? WHY? All the responses from
the contrib cleanup patches seem to suggest that pretty much *everyone*
The responses also been clear in that you are toxic. You've hijacked
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:51 AM, ксовиран xowi...@yandex.ru wrote:
problem is still here, i've got ubuntu on VM and same shared git-folder
causes this problem on Mac Os and no problems on Ubuntu.
git version on Mac is 1.8.0.1 (on Ubuntu is 1.7.10.4)
OSX filesystem code canonicalizes UTF-8
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:12 AM, rahul.chandrashekar
rahul.chandrashe...@in.bosch.com wrote:
I am interested to connect to a GIT SCM through OSLC.
It seems to me a very strange request. There is a very well
implemented, fit-for-purpose git protocol. OSLC, after some
googling, is a REST-style
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Yi, EungJun semtlen...@gmail.com wrote:
bee-lob or bla:b?
Like Bob, add an L in there.
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:46 AM, René Scharfe
rene.scha...@lsrfire.ath.cx wrote:
You probably didn't intend it, but your sentences at the top can be read
more like: This is a logical consequence. If you don't understand that,
your mental capabilities must be lacking.. That's obviously (ha!) a
Felipe,
I'll invite you to reread some of your words:
That being said, I did wonder what must be going through his mind to
not see that as obvious,
(...)
Following the guideline of always assuming good faith
So perhaps it does apply that you could try to assume good
intellectual faith in
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
git presently contains one Python extension command, Pete Wycoff's p4
importer. If my git-weave code is merged it will acquire another.
Write a really compelling tool. Don't argue languages. Make it
wonderful. The git
First of all, I am at the same time a sad, nostalgic, and very happy
that old cvsimport is getting replaced.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
Two of the three claims in this paragraph are false. The manual page
does not tell you what is true, which is
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
Replacement with something more solid is welcome, but until you are
extremely confident of its handling of legacy setups... I would still
provide the old cvsimport, perhaps
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
I dealt with enough CVS repos to see that the branch point could be
ambiguous, and that some cases were incurably ugly and ambiguous.
You are quite right, but you have
On a new machine, trying to boostrap into latest cogito, I download
and make cogito 0.12.1, and then...
$ cg-clone http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/cogito/cogito.git cogito
defaulting to local storage area
14:48:53 URL:http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/cogito/cogito.git/refs/heads/master
[41/41] -
On 8/11/05, Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian packaging fixes for 0.99.4:
Is this anywhere in the archive?
cheers,
martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
I don't think he wants sourceforge to host git, I think he'd like
sourceforge to provide access to source trees via git, instead of
cvs. Read that as, I want to do:
Correct, that's what I am looking for. My hope is that if enough
people ask SF might actually provide such a service.
- the git architecture is admirably suited to an _untrusted_ central
server, ie exactly the SourceForge kind of setup. I realize that the
Definitely. And beyond that too. Using SF for CVS means that when SF's
CVS service is down (often enough) you can't commit (or even fscking
diff) until
On 8/14/05, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was planning to be there. I like lca, but passed it over this year
because of it being in Canberra
And how are things lining up for the upcoming one (January 2006, Dunedin, NZ)?
I would gladly try and organize a workshop, but I am far
Marco,
How do I get this to build on Debian? Not familiar with scons, and it
is complaining that it can't find qt and related header files, when
they are there...
It's been mentioned on the list that v0.3 didn't build on Debian, but
I thought it had been dealt with. There were no fixes mentioned
After having done a cvs import of Moodle using git-cvsimport-script
all the cvs branches show up as heads. How do I switch heads within a
checkout? cogito doesn't seem to be able to, and I'm unsure on how to
do it with git.
And I am confused about the difference between heads and branches. Git
Just do
git checkout branch-name
to switch between them.
thanks! I was doing cg-branch-chg branch-name and it wasn't working.
So in a cvsimport, you'll never see a merge back to the head, even if one
technically took place.
There may be some surprises in here! gitk --all shows
our chances of detecting merges and reduce imported
repository size.
Signed-off: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/git-cvsimport-script.txt |7 ++-
git-cvsimport-script | 10 ++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions
On 8/15/05, Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[PATCH] Add -k kill keyword expansion option to git-cvsimport
Bad patch! Please ignore while I fix and resend...
apologies.
martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
size.
Signed-off: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/git-cvsimport-script.txt |7 ++-
git-cvsimport-script | 12 +++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
68d02ed3485e389315f33ab6387c0f1fc028b255
diff --git a/Documentation/git
On 8/15/05, Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The discussion between you and Linus since you brought this up
has kept me wondering if -ko is the only thing people may want
to do, or sometimes -kk or even -kb or -kv make sense for some
The git-cvsimport script requests the full file at a
On 8/15/05, Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't cvs default -kkv?
You're right, default is -kkv (expand keyword/value every time) and
not -kv (expand keyword/value only if previously unexpanded).
There's something else in the -kb / -ko distinction according to the
protocol description
On 8/15/05, Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering if we are limiting options for people who
want to convert their own CVS repositories by always using
either -kkv or -ko and nothing else.
I think the other modes are relevant in different scenarios. -kv is
only
You just need to add -I/usr/include/qt3/ in the appropriate place in the
scons control file, IIRC.
I figured out that it wanted qt3-mt, installed it, and fiddled with
the SConfiguration file. Still no dice, perhaps because I have a qt4
build environment?
$ QTDIR=/usr/ make
scons -Q
Retrieved
On 8/15/05, Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Umm, actually, no, cvsimport doesn't do merges. Dunno where Martin got his
from, but it wasn't me. ;-)
Just wishful thinking, and a viewing things on a remote box over a
slow x11-over-ssh connection. When I think about it, it doesn't seem
On 8/16/05, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The good news is that if you guess wrong, and you claim a merge where none
exists, it doesn't really do any real damage.
I had figured out what part of the code I wanted to hack, but was
concerned that marking things that were merges in
Just a work-in-progress sample. I've done a pretty successful import
of a small tree with this patch. It is showing the merges /almost/ in
the right place. The almost is due to bad cvs practices, and not this
code.
Definitely doable, though it'll never be nice -- CVS doesn't have
the right data
Following an extenal repo, I am not getting all the heads. This is by
design, AFAIK, and the question is how do I find what heads the repo
offers and pull them in so I can call them by name?
cheers,
martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message
On 8/16/05, Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Following an extenal repo, I am not getting all the heads. This is by
design, AFAIK, and the question is how do I find what heads the repo
offers and pull them in so I can call them by name?
I
exploration of the different -k modes in the cvs protocol, we use -kk
which kills keyword expansion wherever possible. Against the protocol
spec, -ko and -kb will sometimes expand keywords.
Should improve our chances of detecting merges and reduce imported
repository size.
Signed-off: Martin
are bogus or incomplete, the resulting
branches are in better state to go forward (and merge) than without any
merge detection.
Signed-off-by: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/git-cvsimport-script.txt | 13 -
git-cvsimport-script | 48
I haven't seen this problem myself. There are some recent patches
Junio merged that handle some oddities better. Give the 'pu' branch a
go if you can.
I take it that the repo is not public. I'd like to try and reproduce
the problem. Can you get it to happen with a public repository?
For
On 8/16/05, Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, the -kk change one is a corrupted patch and does not
apply. Your MUA ate leading whitespaces, perhaps.
I stupidly did a forward. Rebased to your current pu branch and sent.
From now on I'll be sending straight from cmdline.
I have
On 8/17/05, Marco Costalba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think?
From what I understand, you'll want the StGIT infrastructure. If you
use git/cogito, there is an underlying assumption that you'll want
all the patches merged across, and a simple cg-update will bring in
all the pending
On 8/16/05, Sven Verdoolaege [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:35:27PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
+
+sub get_headref($$) {
If you want to check whether a ref is valid, then
it is better to use git-rev-parse...
We are reading/writing directly to .git/refs/heads/ a lot
On 8/17/05, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've no idea what I did when I tagged those trees, but according
to a google search, cvsps does that when it find patchsets which
are chronologically (and thus by patchset id) earlier than the tag,
but are tagwise after. Spooky.
It's probably
On 8/17/05, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my case, at least the most recent of those cvs tag operations
was just a 'cvs tag x86info-1_14'. Nothing fancy. I'm fairly sure
there was nothing fancy about the earlier instance either.
So sure in fact, I had to look up that -F flag in the
On 8/17/05, Marco Costalba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course I can feed proper subject and description to git-commit but I would
like
to find something less intrusive
I don't know if it helps, but I think that StGIT is what you are
looking for, not only because you have more tools to deal
We have a small team of 3, and our main activity is to run local
branches of upstream projects, plus some local development. In that
context, I am designing our cogito/git usage strategy, and I'm
interested in comments.
My intention is to use cogito as much as possible, and insulate our
team from
On 8/18/05, Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a small team of 3, and our main activity is to run local
To self: RTFM, specifically, Documentation/tutorial.txt
I had read it early on and either didn't get to the end of it, or had
forgotten already.
Apologies,
martin
In the section 'Emulating CVS behaviour', where the team setup is
described with a team 'merger'. What is not clear is how to deal with
project-wide branches. Should they be created in the master repo, and
everyone clone a new repo from it?
With a team of 10 people, and perhaps 4 or 5 branches,
With todays git and cogito:
moodle-git-merge$ git-push-script --all ~/public_html/repos/moodle.git
This unpacked the repo completely, in spite if it being local. Anyway,
from a remote machine I could do cg-clone and it succeeded, though it
took ages:
cg-clone
Resolved. I was missing a call to git-update-server-info. It fails to
make the objects/info directory, so that had to be done manually.
GIT_DIR=~/public_html/repos/moodle.git git-update-server-info
error: cannot open
/home/martin/public_html/repos/moodle.git/objects/info/packs+
mkdir
I am drafting an import script to turn a GNU Arch into a GIT archive.
Importing the branches and commits increamentally is reasonably
straightforward -- or so it seems so far. Note: the repository
manipulation is based on cvsimport -- so my knowledge of the git repo
internals is still pertty close
It's sometimes unclear which head is ahead of the other. If I get
the order wrong, cg-log shows no log output. Is this expected?
I was expecting a warning, or a reverse-ordered log. Or both. ;)
martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to
On 8/24/05, Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First draft of an Arch import.
And now, with sample script attached, too.
cheers,
martin
git-archimport-script
Description: Binary data
Gave the code another pass. The code should be more readable, and make
a bit more sense.
It now:
- handles commit timestamps correctly
- handles binary files correctly
- uses parselog() to tell git-update-cache what's been
added/deleted/modified - much faster commits on large trees
- gets the
Linus,
I like the solution you are suggesting, but I suspect it will create
more problems that it will solve, and while the coolness factor is
drawing me in we ain't gonna need it, as the xp people say.
More below...
On 8/26/05, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Git won't care, so
On 8/26/05, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, storing the metadata in a branch will allow us to run the import
in alternating repositories. But as Junio points out, unless I can
guarantee that the metadata and the tree are in sync, I cannot
trivially resume the import cycle
On 8/26/05, Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
their core GIT tools come from. But how would _I_ pull from
that My Project, if I did not want to pull unrelated stuff in?
and then...
What I think _might_ deserve a bit more support would be a merge
of a foreign project as a subdirectory
On 8/27/05, Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with both of these (and doing it in the build system) is that,
when a project includes another project, you generally don't want whatever
revision of the included project happens to be the latest; you want the
revision of the
I am running git/cogito on MacOSX 10.3.x mostly as a client, and it
works pretty well. My main dev machines are Debian boxes, so the OSX
build is most often just fetching commits and running cg-log. So it's
not very intensive ;)
I get all my build dependencies from Fink, and also get diffutils
On 8/28/05, Kalle Valo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The documentation says that it should be possible to update
incrementally from the CVS repository. Am I doing something wrong or
is this a bug?
It _should_ work the way you are running it, so consider it a bug. Do
you think you can do some
On 8/27/05, Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is _one_ bug I've seen with cg-diff and I haven't had time to
fix. On OSX, running cg-diff with no parameters doesn't show anything.
For some reason, it fails to list the files. If you give it the paths
explicitly, it'll give you
On 8/29/05, Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a new branch 'ben_dev_rfcnt'.
Now, I also have another patch that I wanted to pull into git.
Before merging this, I created another branch 'foo'.
I changed to this branch foo and imported my patch and resolved the
conflicts, etc.
Petr's tree in kernel.org hasn't been updated for 2 weeks, and we
haven't seen him on the list for about 2 weeks too. Is he on holiday
or otherwise MIA?
Yesterday I got a bunch of patches from a cow-orker to get cogito-0.13
debian build scripts to work correctly, and when I looked at the
cogito
Calls to cg-diff without filename parameters were dependent on GNU xargs
traits. BSD xargs is hardcoded to do --no-run-if-empty -- so if the filter
is effectively empty we avoid calling xargs.
Signed-off-by: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cg-diff |6 +-
1 files changed, 5
On 8/29/05, Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blame the xargs implementation. Fixed.
I posted the patch at the same time that I was writing this, but it
got eaten by a b0rken MTA setup on my laptop. Reposted.
cheers,
martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git
cg-merge currently clobbers local changes while runnign cg-update. Do the
safe thing and refuse to update on a dirty tree.
Signed-off-by: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cg-update |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
7a961c02ee6228c2a80869b4b3f179a7e279df8e
'
Signed-off-by: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/git-archimport-script b/git-archimport-script
new file mode 100755
--- /dev/null
+++ b/git-archimport-script
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+#!/usr/bin/perl -w
+#
+# This tool is copyright (c) 2005, Martin Langhoff.
+# It is released under the Gnu
Agreed on the impossibility of 3-way merges with binary files. In the
branch I want to replay, though, I have commits that add and change
binary files.
About 'unrelated' trees, if you know of a good tree you can use
setup snipped
$ git-read-tree -m -u c master b
$ git-merge-cache -o
On 9/4/05, Kalle Valo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to clone the git repository this morning and it fails
every time:
got 15891f81e0fa99333ad81e9271df5b2a72ba368e
error: Couldn't get
http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/refs/heads/dbrt-test for
heads/dbrt-test
Tried to repro,
Arch tags are full commits (without any changed files) as well. Trust Arch
to have put an unchanged tree in place (which seems to do reliably), and
just add a tag new branch. Speeds up Arch imports significantly, and leaves
history in a much saner state.
Signed-off-by: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL
If there is no GIT directory, archimport will assume it is an initial import.
It now also supports incremental imports, skipping seen commits. You can
now run it repeatedly to pull new commits from the Arch repository.
Signed-off-by: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
git-archimport
Ryan,
is it possible to fix the git-send-email script to just work reading
in the emails that `git-format-patch-script -o patchdir origin`
generates? I have a very ugly local patch to git-send-email-script
that
- reads from from git-var, can be overridden by passing an explicit --from
- reads
On 9/6/05, Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry about that - I always export using git-format-patch using --mbox,
and those work nicely. I'm a bit reluctant to do the [PATCH] fixup, but
I think I will:
Thanks Ryan for the clarification! I
On 9/6/05, Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really; --mbox output is one-file-per-patch and it is up to
you which ones to pick and concatenate them in what order, if you
want them in a single file.
Hr. Then I better hide away in a little cave, and shut my big mouth up. ;-)
It
On 9/6/05, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grepping for strings.
For example, when renaming a binary, the sane way to check that you fixed
all users right now is
grep old-binary-name *.c *.h *-scripts
and you catch all users.
Grep knows how to ignore binary files. Try:
On 9/6/05, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That wasn't the _point_.
Agreed - sorry I should have qualified my comment.
I agree with having useful extensions for ease of development. And I
agree with the suggestion of installing them with stripped extensions
-- to extend the abstraction.
On 9/7/05, H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Langhoff wrote:
Tell me more about how you are trying the 'recognize merge'. It is a
pretty unsophisticated thing, as it trusts the commit message in the
first place. But when it works, it works.
Perhaps it would be good
On 9/7/05, H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch changes git-cvsimport-script so that it creates tag objects
instead of refs to commits, and adds an option, -u, to convert
underscores in branch and tag names to dots (since CVS doesn't allow
dots in branches and tags.)
looks good.
With Archzoom, when looking at a particular commit/cset you get a
small [tarball] link that does an 'export' of the whole tree at that
patchlevel and tars it up for the user. It's heavy on the server and
bandwidth, but if you can afford it, it is mighty useful to push out
patches immediately to
Yes, this is nice for smaller projects. But I don't think, that we want
to do such a thing on the kernel.org servers.
I think this is a very useful feature for for some, but not all,
repositories. Default it to off and have a magic file (like git-daemon),
or a config variable turn it on.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
mer...@stonehenge.com wrote:
Darek == Darek Bridges darek.brid...@me.com writes:
Darek I use git for many things, but I am trying to work out the
Darek workflow to use git for deployment.
Don't.
Heh. Best to keep in mind that it just
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:47 PM, David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if it was the big files part that Randal was responding
to. IIUC it was the using git for deployment part.
Packaging tools (Makefiles, .rpm, .deb, etc) are a better suited for
deploying software.
Fair
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Elia Pinto gitter.spi...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, many folks use puppet in serverless configuration pushing the
manifest from a central git server via cron and applying locally the
configuration fetched. In this sense git IS used for deployement. And,
for a
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
git show -s ':/^t1100-.*: Fix an interm'
That doesn't work for me (git 1.7.10.4 as per Fedora 18 rpms) in
git.git. But the idea is sound -- git can give you the sha1 trivially.
You don't need additional glue.
But
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
The idea was that you do not have to give abbreviated SHA-1 to Git
in the first place.
Ah, sorry, I didn't get _that_ point. I thought you were trying to
demo a way to get a sha1.
What doesn't work? My copy of v1.7.10.1
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo