On Wed, 24 September 2014 22:09:33 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
This is fine for those who use quilt with --fuzz=0, but how are you
helping those who use quilt without --fuzz=0?
I agree that unconditionally passing -C1 is a bad thing, but
unconditionally passing -C2 is not that better.
git-quiltimport passed -C1 to git-apply, supposedly to roughly match
the quilt default of --fuzz 2. This is against the spirit of git.
Quoting Linus:
Except unlike the standard patch program, git apply doesn't accept
fuzz by default (which to me is a huge deal - I hate how patch tries
to
On Mon, 28 April 2014 10:14:05 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
- Original Message -
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 09:12:39AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
The intent of the commit was that is a stupid thing to do, but it's
not so obvious
On Mon, 28 April 2014 16:04:28 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Just the Sign-off is trivial enough that even this brainless
patch-monkey^Wpanda should be able to handle. The part The log
message could be improved is something you may be better equipped
to, though.
Looks good to me. The next
On Mon, 21 April 2014 16:46:22 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
This reverts commit 88e8f908f2b0c56f9ccf8134d8ff9f689af9cc84.
Caused a usability regression for me and foul language for my coworkers.
Ping.
Jörn
--
People really ought to be forced to read their code aloud over the phone.
That would
On Fri, 25 April 2014 20:49:52 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Jörn Engel jo...@logfs.org writes:
On Mon, 21 April 2014 16:46:22 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
This reverts commit 88e8f908f2b0c56f9ccf8134d8ff9f689af9cc84.
Caused a usability regression for me and foul language for my coworkers
This reverts commit 88e8f908f2b0c56f9ccf8134d8ff9f689af9cc84.
Caused a usability regression for me and foul language for my coworkers.
In particular, I commonly do a git log, with results going through
less, find a potentially interesting commit and execute git show
commit from less. This used
7 matches
Mail list logo
