---
compat/bswap.h | 33 -
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compat/bswap.h b/compat/bswap.h
index 120c6c1..f08a9fe 100644
--- a/compat/bswap.h
+++ b/compat/bswap.h
@@ -101,19 +101,34 @@ static inline uint64_t git_bswap64(uint64_t x)
Charles Bailey cbaile...@bloomberg.net writes:
---
Please sign-off your patches ;-)
This swaps the precedence of BYTE_ORDER and __BYTE_ORDER from the
original, which we may not want to. It is easy for me to swap the
order of if/elif to restore it, so it is not a big deal, though.
Thanks.
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:48:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Charles Bailey cbaile...@bloomberg.net writes:
---
Please sign-off your patches ;-)
Oops! Please consider this patch...
Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey cbaile...@bloomberg.net
This swaps the precedence of BYTE_ORDER and
Charles Bailey cbaile...@bloomberg.net writes:
I claim that any
platform which provides both but with differing senses is somewhat
broken so I cannot see the precedence mattering much.
I agree with that, and that is the reason why we shouldn't change
the order all of a sudden. If it
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Charles Bailey cbaile...@bloomberg.net writes:
I claim that any
platform which provides both but with differing senses is somewhat
broken so I cannot see the precedence mattering much.
I agree with that, and that is the reason why we shouldn't
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:43:32PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
So,... I am inclined to queue this on top of your patch at least for
now, before I go into incommunicado-mode to finish preparing -rc2.
Yes, I'd agree with that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
6 matches
Mail list logo