On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Stefan Beller stefanbel...@googlemail.com writes:
Indeed the patch tests for both bugs unintentionally.
I was puzzled because I do not think that is what is happening with
the posted patch.
The off-by-one fix seems to
This is a regression test for a66e77eab70a08938fdc2227b7ada0f0465c6991
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller stefanbel...@googlemail.com
---
t/t4203-mailmap.sh | 41 +
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t4203-mailmap.sh b/t/t4203-mailmap.sh
index
Stefan Beller stefanbel...@googlemail.com writes:
This is a regression test for a66e77eab70a08938fdc2227b7ada0f0465c6991
Sorry, I do not quite get this.
If you apply the patch on top of the said commit before that commit, the
new test does not pass.
But if you apply the patch on top of the
On 07/13/2013 07:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Stefan Beller stefanbel...@googlemail.com writes:
This is a regression test for a66e77eab70a08938fdc2227b7ada0f0465c6991
Sorry, I do not quite get this.
If you apply the patch on top of the said commit before that commit, the
new test does
Stefan Beller stefanbel...@googlemail.com writes:
Indeed the patch tests for both bugs unintentionally.
I was puzzled because I do not think that is what is happening with
the posted patch.
If I drop the tip one from jc/mailmap-case-insensitivity and apply
this patch instead, the test passes
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Stefan Beller
stefanbel...@googlemail.com wrote:
This is a regression test for a66e77eab70a08938fdc2227b7ada0f0465c6991
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller stefanbel...@googlemail.com
---
t/t4203-mailmap.sh | 41 +
1 file
6 matches
Mail list logo