Re: [PATCH] t6036: avoid "cp -a"

2018-12-01 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
Thanks both. Agree with Junio it would be better if squashed; apologize
for not catching it earlier, but the following might help to make it
visible for anyone that care to run the linter:

  $ make test-lint-shell-syntax

Carlo
-- >8 --
From: =?UTF-8?q?Carlo=20Marcelo=20Arenas=20Bel=C3=B3n?= 
Subject: [PATCH] tests: add lint for non portable cp -a

cp -a, while a common flag isn't in POSIX and will therefore fail
on systems that don't have GNUish tools (like OpenBSD, AIX or Solaris)

Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón 
---
 t/check-non-portable-shell.pl | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/t/check-non-portable-shell.pl b/t/check-non-portable-shell.pl
index b45bdac688..8037eef777 100755
--- a/t/check-non-portable-shell.pl
+++ b/t/check-non-portable-shell.pl
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ sub err {
chomp;
}
 
+   /\bcp\s+-a/ and err 'cp -a is not portable';
/\bsed\s+-i/ and err 'sed -i is not portable';
/\becho\s+-[neE]/ and err 'echo with option is not portable (use 
printf)';
/^\s*declare\s+/ and err 'arrays/declare not portable';
-- 
2.20.0.rc2



Re: [PATCH] t6036: avoid "cp -a"

2018-12-01 Thread Junio C Hamano
Elijah Newren  writes:

> Thanks for the patch!
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 6:52 PM Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
> ...
> Oops.  Thanks for catching.  To be honest, we don't even need -a, -R,
> etc. -- it was just a habit for me to add -a after cp.  A simple cp
> would do, though what you have here is fine too.

Thanks, both.  I think the topic won't escape 'next' until 2.20
final, and after that we can rewind 'next', so it may be better
to squash it in, but anyway...

-- >8 --
From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón 
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:52:12 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] t6036: avoid non-portable "cp -a"

b8cd1bb713 ("t6036, t6043: increase code coverage for file collision
handling", 2018-11-07) uses this GNU extension that is not available
in a POSIX complaint cp.  In this particular case, there is no need to
use the option, as it is just copying a single file to create another
file.

Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano 
---
 t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh 
b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
index b7488b00c0..d23b948f27 100755
--- a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
+++ b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
@@ -1631,7 +1631,7 @@ test_expect_success 'check nested conflicts' '
 
# Compare m to expected contents
>empty &&
-   cp -a m_stage_2 expected_final_m &&
+   cp m_stage_2 expected_final_m &&
test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \
-L "HEAD" \
-L "merged common ancestors"  \
-- 
2.20.0-rc1-10-g7068cbc4ab



Re: [PATCH] t6036: avoid "cp -a"

2018-11-30 Thread Elijah Newren
Hi,

Thanks for the patch!

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 6:52 PM Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
 wrote:
>
> b8cd1bb713 ("t6036, t6043: increase code coverage for file collision 
> handling", 2018-11-07) uses this GNU extension that is not available in a 
> POSIX complaint

This is an extraordinarily long line; can you rewrap at around 72 characters?

> cp; use cp -R instead
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón 
> ---
> to be applied on top of en/merge-path-collision for next
>
>  t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh 
> b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
> index b7488b00c0..fdb120d0dc 100755
> --- a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
> +++ b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
> @@ -1631,7 +1631,7 @@ test_expect_success 'check nested conflicts' '
>
> # Compare m to expected contents
> >empty &&
> -   cp -a m_stage_2 expected_final_m &&
> +   cp -R m_stage_2 expected_final_m &&
> test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \
> -L "HEAD" \
> -L "merged common ancestors"  \
> --
> 2.20.0.rc1.6.ga1598010f

Oops.  Thanks for catching.  To be honest, we don't even need -a, -R,
etc. -- it was just a habit for me to add -a after cp.  A simple cp
would do, though what you have here is fine too.


[PATCH] t6036: avoid "cp -a"

2018-11-30 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
b8cd1bb713 ("t6036, t6043: increase code coverage for file collision handling", 
2018-11-07) uses this GNU extension that is not available in a POSIX complaint
cp; use cp -R instead

Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón 
---
to be applied on top of en/merge-path-collision for next

 t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh 
b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
index b7488b00c0..fdb120d0dc 100755
--- a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
+++ b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
@@ -1631,7 +1631,7 @@ test_expect_success 'check nested conflicts' '
 
# Compare m to expected contents
>empty &&
-   cp -a m_stage_2 expected_final_m &&
+   cp -R m_stage_2 expected_final_m &&
test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \
-L "HEAD" \
-L "merged common ancestors"  \
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.6.ga1598010f