On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:23:43PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> > > Because transport_fetch_refs() filters the refs sent to the transport,
> > > it cannot just report the transport's result directly, but first needs
> > > to readd the excluded refs, pretending that they are fetched. However,
> >
On 07/31, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 03:56:01PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> >
> > > Commit 989b8c4452 ("fetch-pack: put shallow info in output parameter",
> > > 2018-06-28) allows transports to report the refs that they have fetched
> > > in a new out-parameter
> What leaves me even more confused is that the entire log message
> does not make it clear what the end-user observable problem the
> patch is trying to solve.
>
> Is this "we sometimes follow and sometimes fail to follow refs while
> fetching"? Does it affect all protocol versions and
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 03:56:01PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
>
> > Commit 989b8c4452 ("fetch-pack: put shallow info in output parameter",
> > 2018-06-28) allows transports to report the refs that they have fetched
> > in a new out-parameter "fetched_refs". If they do so,
> >
Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 03:56:01PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
>
>> Commit 989b8c4452 ("fetch-pack: put shallow info in output parameter",
>> 2018-06-28) allows transports to report the refs that they have fetched
>> in a new out-parameter "fetched_refs". If they do so,
>>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 03:56:01PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> Commit 989b8c4452 ("fetch-pack: put shallow info in output parameter",
> 2018-06-28) allows transports to report the refs that they have fetched
> in a new out-parameter "fetched_refs". If they do so,
> transport_fetch_refs() makes
Commit 989b8c4452 ("fetch-pack: put shallow info in output parameter",
2018-06-28) allows transports to report the refs that they have fetched
in a new out-parameter "fetched_refs". If they do so,
transport_fetch_refs() makes this information available to its caller.
Because
7 matches
Mail list logo
