I plan to work on this in few weeks. If anybody has more suggestion or
want to discuss the implementation let me know
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Jakub Narębski jna...@gmail.com writes:
W dniu 2014-04-03 23:44, Junio C Hamano pisze:
René Scharfe
W dniu 2014-04-03 23:44, Junio C Hamano pisze:
René Scharfe l@web.de writes:
With that approach you depend on the hunk header and apparently need
to add XDL_EMIT_MOREFUNCNAMES and XDL_EMIT_MOREHUNKHEADS to improve
the results. This approach feels fragile.
Would it perhaps be more robust
Jakub Narębski jna...@gmail.com writes:
W dniu 2014-04-03 23:44, Junio C Hamano pisze:
René Scharfe l@web.de writes:
With that approach you depend on the hunk header and apparently need
to add XDL_EMIT_MOREFUNCNAMES and XDL_EMIT_MOREHUNKHEADS to improve
the results. This approach feels
Am 27.03.2014 19:50, schrieb David A. Dalrymple (and Bhushan G. Lodha):
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
This is similar to the pickaxe grep option (-G), but applies the
provided regex only to diff hunk headers, thereby showing only those
commits which affect a
René Scharfe l@web.de writes:
With that approach you depend on the hunk header and apparently need
to add XDL_EMIT_MOREFUNCNAMES and XDL_EMIT_MOREHUNKHEADS to improve
the results. This approach feels fragile.
Would it perhaps be more robust to not base the implementation on diff
and
From: Bhushan G. Lodha David A. Dalrymple dad-...@mit.edu
This is similar to the pickaxe grep option (-G), but applies the
provided regex only to diff hunk headers, thereby showing only those
commits which affect a function with a definition line matching the
pattern. These are functions in the
6 matches
Mail list logo
