On 02/06/2014 09:17 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
How do I use the only-look-at-HEAD mode from a non-bare repo? If I
want attributes with respect to some other commit instead of HEAD, is
there a syntax for that? The command doesn't seem to have been well
thought out.
I agree that it would be
Lasse Makholm noticed that running git check-attr from a place
totally unrelated to $GIT_DIR and $GIT_WORK_TREE does not give
expected results. I think it is because the command does not say it
wants to call setup_work_tree().
We still need to support use cases where only a bare repository is
Hi,
Junio C Hamano wrote:
--- a/builtin/check-attr.c
+++ b/builtin/check-attr.c
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ int cmd_check_attr(int argc, const char **argv, const char
*prefix)
struct git_attr_check *check;
int cnt, i, doubledash, filei;
+ if (!is_bare_repository())
+
Hi again,
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
+if (!is_bare_repository())
+setup_work_tree();
Hm. Shouldn't check-attr error out when run without a worktree and
without --cached?
That would mean something like
diff --git i/builtin/check-attr.c
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Someone asked in a private reply how this interacts with t0003.
It was me mistakenly using reply not reply all.
t0003 tries check-attr in a bare repository. The question is, is that
a desirable feature, and are people relying on it?
Running
5 matches
Mail list logo
