2014-04-18 2:08 GMT+08:00 Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com:
Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com writes:
When extract l10n messages, we use --add-comments option to keep
comments right above the l10n messages for references. But sometimes
irrelevant comments are also extracted. For example in
Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com writes:
I am not very happy with this change, as it would force us to
special case Translators comment to follow a non-standard
multi-line comment formatting convention. Is there a way to tell
xgettext to accept both of these forms?
/*
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Documentation/CodingGuidelines may want to have a sentence of two to
explain this, though.
After re-reading what I sent out, I realized that the way I singled
out multi-line comments was misleading. Here is an updated version.
-- 8 --
Subject: [PATCH]
Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com writes:
When extract l10n messages, we use --add-comments option to keep
comments right above the l10n messages for references. But sometimes
irrelevant comments are also extracted. For example in the following
code block, the comment in line 2 will be
When extract l10n messages, we use --add-comments option to keep
comments right above the l10n messages for references. But sometimes
irrelevant comments are also extracted. For example in the following
code block, the comment in line 2 will be extracted as comment for the
l10n message in line
5 matches
Mail list logo
