On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 02:36:11PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Thinking on this more, I wonder if we should just do something like
this:
[...]
Yes!
Here it is as a Real Patch™. I just based it on master, so it can
replace your 5537/5538 fix in your series.
Next stop, attempt to start httpd
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Here it is as a Real Patch™. I just based it on master, so it can
replace your 5537/5538 fix in your series.
Thanks, looks good. Will put this at the bottom and rebuild the
nd/http-fetch-shallow-fix series on top.
1. Is there anybody who has apache
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:15:24PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
Thanks. It might be worth squashing in the patch below (or sticking it
on top), to cover git-daemon as well.
Patch would probably be easier to read if I actually included it...
-- 8 --
Subject: [PATCH] tests: auto-set git-daemon port
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:23:53AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Here it is as a Real Patch™. I just based it on master, so it can
replace your 5537/5538 fix in your series.
Thanks, looks good. Will put this at the bottom and rebuild the
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:35:33PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:10:35PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
Originally I had t5537 use port 5536 and 5538 use port 5537(!). Then
Jeff found my fault so I changed port in t5537 from 5536 to 5537 in
3b32a7c (t5537: fix
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Thinking on this more, I wonder if we should just do something like
this:
diff --git a/t/lib-httpd.sh b/t/lib-httpd.sh
index bfdff2a..c82b4ee 100644
--- a/t/lib-httpd.sh
+++ b/t/lib-httpd.sh
@@ -64,7 +64,9 @@ case $(uname) in
Originally I had t5537 use port 5536 and 5538 use port 5537(!). Then
Jeff found my fault so I changed port in t5537 from 5536 to 5537 in
3b32a7c (t5537: fix incorrect expectation in test case 10 -
2014-01-08). Which makes it worse because now both t5537 and t5538
both use the same port. Fix it.
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:10:35PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
Originally I had t5537 use port 5536 and 5538 use port 5537(!). Then
Jeff found my fault so I changed port in t5537 from 5536 to 5537 in
3b32a7c (t5537: fix incorrect expectation in test case 10 -
2014-01-08). Which makes
8 matches
Mail list logo