On 01/10/2014 12:01 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
As long as we're being pathologically stingy with mallocs, we might as
well do the math right and save 6 (!) bytes.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
---
It is left to the reader
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
As for removing the third argument of refname_match(): although all
callers pass it ref_ref_parse_rules, that array is sometimes passed to
the function via the alias ref_fetch_rules. So I suppose somebody
wanted to leave the way open to make
As long as we're being pathologically stingy with mallocs, we might as
well do the math right and save 6 (!) bytes.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
---
It is left to the reader to show how another 7 bytes could be saved
(11 bytes on a 64-bit architecture!)
It probably
3 matches
Mail list logo
