Re: [PATCH 3/5] doc/pretty-formats: describe index/time formats for %gd

Jeff King writes: > Maybe this on top of the other documentation patches? > > -- >8 -- > Subject: [PATCH] doc/pretty-formats: explain shortening of %gd > > The actual shortening rules aren't that interesting and > probably not worth getting into (I gloss over them here as >

Re: [PATCH 3/5] doc/pretty-formats: describe index/time formats for %gd

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:48:34PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:05:13AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > The "reflog selector" format changes based on a series of > > heuristics, and that applies equally to both stock "log -g" > > output, as well as "--format=%gd". The

Re: [PATCH 3/5] doc/pretty-formats: describe index/time formats for %gd

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:05:13AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > The "reflog selector" format changes based on a series of > heuristics, and that applies equally to both stock "log -g" > output, as well as "--format=%gd". The documentation for > "%gd" doesn't cover this. Let's mention the multiple

[PATCH 3/5] doc/pretty-formats: describe index/time formats for %gd

The "reflog selector" format changes based on a series of heuristics, and that applies equally to both stock "log -g" output, as well as "--format=%gd". The documentation for "%gd" doesn't cover this. Let's mention the multiple formats and refer the user back to the "-g" section for the complete