On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:50:00PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:06:17AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> >
> > The documentation claims that "raw-local" does not work. It
> > does, but the end result is rather subtle. Let's describe it
> > in better detail, and test to make
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:06:17AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
> The documentation claims that "raw-local" does not work. It
> does, but the end result is rather subtle. Let's describe it
> in better detail, and test to make sure it works (namely,
> the epoch time doesn't change, but the zone
The "raw" format shows a Unix epoch timestamp, but with a
timezone tacked on. The timestamp is not _in_ that zone, but
it is extra information about the time (by default, the zone
the author was in).
The documentation claims that "raw-local" does not work. It
does, but the end result is rather
3 matches
Mail list logo
