Hi Junio,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Junio C Hamano writes:
> >
> > > Thomas Gummerer writes:
> > >
> > >> Thanks for your work on this! I have read through the range-diff and
> > >> the new patch of this last round,
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > Thomas Gummerer writes:
> >
> >> Thanks for your work on this! I have read through the range-diff and
> >> the new patch of this last round, and this addresses all the comments
> >> I had on v10 (and some
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
>> Thanks for your work on this! I have read through the range-diff and
>> the new patch of this last round, and this addresses all the comments
>> I had on v10 (and some more :)). I consider it
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gummerer
>
> Thanks.
>
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> Thanks for your work on this! I have read through the range-diff and
> the new patch of this last round, and this addresses all the comments
> I had on v10 (and some more :)). I consider it
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gummerer
Thanks.
One thing that bothers me is that
On 11/23, Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the 11th iteration of C git stash. Here are some of the changes,
> based on Thomas's and dscho's suggestions (from mailing list / pull request
> #495):
Thanks for your work on this! I have read through the range-diff and
the new
Hello,
This is the 11th iteration of C git stash. Here are some of the changes,
based on Thomas's and dscho's suggestions (from mailing list / pull request
#495):
- improved memory management. Now, the callers of `do_create_stash()`
are responsible of freeing the parameter they pass in.
6 matches
Mail list logo