Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Consistently use the term builtin instead of internal command

On 02.01.2014 22:05, Sebastian Schuberth wrote: would just leave me wondering I never claimed it was built-in; what's going on? I think it would be simplest to keep it as $ git whatever fatal: cannot handle whatever internally which at least makes it clear that this is a

[PATCH v2 1/4] Consistently use the term builtin instead of internal command

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com --- Documentation/technical/api-builtin.txt | 2 +- git.c | 14 +++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-builtin.txt

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Consistently use the term builtin instead of internal command

Hi, Sebastian Schuberth wrote: [...] --- a/Documentation/technical/api-builtin.txt +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-builtin.txt @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Git: . Add the external declaration for the function to `builtin.h`. -. Add the command to `commands[]` table in

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Consistently use the term builtin instead of internal command

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: would just leave me wondering I never claimed it was built-in; what's going on? I think it would be simplest to keep it as $ git whatever fatal: cannot handle whatever internally which at least makes