On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner wrote:
> Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this
> set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one (unless
> folks would rather see those changes before reviewing). Let me know.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner wrote:
> Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this
> set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one (unless
> folks would rather see those changes before reviewing). Let me know.
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 20:39 +, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
> On 04/02/16 20:25, David Turner wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 18:42 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner <
> > > dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
> > > > Are there any more reviews on this? I do
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 17:09 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner <
> dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
> > Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from
> > this
> > set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one
> > (unless
> >
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 21:58 -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:54:44AM +, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
> > > They were working for me as-of the time I sent them. I guess
> > > something
> > > must have broken since. I'll rebase, test, and send a new
> > > series.
> >
> > I
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 18:42 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner <
> dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
> > Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from
> > this
> > set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one
> > (unless
> >
On 04/02/16 20:25, David Turner wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 18:42 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner <
>> dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
>>> Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from
>>> this
>>> set, but they're pretty minor so I
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 16:09 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > David Turner writes:
> >
> > > Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from
> > > this
> > > set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to
On 04/02/16 01:12, David Turner wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 16:09 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Junio C Hamano writes:
>>
>>> David Turner writes:
>>>
Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from
this
set, but
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:54:44AM +, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> > They were working for me as-of the time I sent them. I guess something
> > must have broken since. I'll rebase, test, and send a new series.
>
> I didn't spend too long looking at it, but I think this interacts with
> Jeff's
Junio C Hamano writes:
> David Turner writes:
>
>> Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this
>> set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one (unless
>> folks would rather see those changes before
David Turner writes:
> Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this
> set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one (unless
> folks would rather see those changes before reviewing). Let me know.
Thanks for pinging. As this
Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this
set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one (unless
folks would rather see those changes before reviewing). Let me know.
Thanks.
On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 11:25 -0500, David Turner wrote:
> I rebased this on
13 matches
Mail list logo