Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-04 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner wrote: > Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this > set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one (unless > folks would rather see those changes before reviewing). Let me know.

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-04 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner wrote: > Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this > set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one (unless > folks would rather see those changes before reviewing). Let me know.

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-04 Thread David Turner
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 20:39 +, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > On 04/02/16 20:25, David Turner wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 18:42 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner < > > > dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote: > > > > Are there any more reviews on this? I do

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-04 Thread David Turner
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 17:09 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner < > dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote: > > Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from > > this > > set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one > > (unless > >

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-04 Thread David Turner
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 21:58 -0500, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:54:44AM +, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > > > They were working for me as-of the time I sent them. I guess > > > something > > > must have broken since. I'll rebase, test, and send a new > > > series. > > > > I

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-04 Thread David Turner
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 18:42 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner < > dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote: > > Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from > > this > > set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one > > (unless > >

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-04 Thread Ramsay Jones
On 04/02/16 20:25, David Turner wrote: > On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 18:42 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:08 AM, David Turner < >> dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote: >>> Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from >>> this >>> set, but they're pretty minor so I

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-03 Thread David Turner
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 16:09 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > David Turner writes: > > > > > Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from > > > this > > > set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-03 Thread Ramsay Jones
On 04/02/16 01:12, David Turner wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 16:09 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Junio C Hamano writes: >> >>> David Turner writes: >>> Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this set, but

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-03 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:54:44AM +, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > They were working for me as-of the time I sent them. I guess something > > must have broken since. I'll rebase, test, and send a new series. > > I didn't spend too long looking at it, but I think this interacts with > Jeff's

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > David Turner writes: > >> Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this >> set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one (unless >> folks would rather see those changes before

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
David Turner writes: > Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this > set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one (unless > folks would rather see those changes before reviewing). Let me know. Thanks for pinging. As this

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu

2016-02-02 Thread David Turner
Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from this set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one (unless folks would rather see those changes before reviewing). Let me know. Thanks. On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 11:25 -0500, David Turner wrote: > I rebased this on