On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:37:29AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:40 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:34:59PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[PATCH 01/56] was authored by you but has Michael's sign-off, which
looked
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes:
If Junio would like to add my sign-off to the end, he's welcome to do
so:
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net
Heh, too late.
Thanks for explaining the true flow of patches, though.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:40 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:34:59PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[PATCH 01/56] was authored by you but has Michael's sign-off, which
looked somewhat odd to me, though.
Yes, it does. He picked it up from me,
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes:
Changes from v2:
* Adopt Michael Haggerty's patch series that uses an adapter function.
* Squash some of these patches together where it makes sense in order to
reduce the quantity of patches.
This does only slightly more than my
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:34:59PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[PATCH 01/56] was authored by you but has Michael's sign-off, which
looked somewhat odd to me, though.
Yes, it does. He picked it up from me, and signed off, and I took his
branch. I don't believe he changed it, but I didn't
This is a conversion of parts of refs.c to use struct object_id.
refs.c, and the for_each_ref series of functions explicitly, is the
source for many instances of object IDs in the codebase. Therefore, it
makes sense to convert this series of functions to provide a basis for
further conversions.
6 matches
Mail list logo
