Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 04.09.2013 08:31, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes:
Tests are included which verify that this change has no effect on git
submodule
summary without the --for-status option.
I still don't understand
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Fine by me, what would you propose to clarify that? (Though I have the
suspicion that the explanation will be three years late ;-)
I have no idea, as I do not understand the reason myself yet. I'm not
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:30:53AM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 04.09.2013 08:31, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes:
Tests are included which verify that this change has no effect on git
submodule
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes:
Tests are included which verify that this change has no effect on git
submodule
summary without the --for-status option.
I still don't understand why this is needed. Why do we want git status
and git submodule summary to display different
Am 03.09.2013 21:53, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Jens, I see 1/2 is the same as the previous one you already acked.
Yep.
Does this update to 2/2 look good to you? Sorry, but I lost track
of the discussion that led to this reroll, hence a ping.
v3 fixes the bug Matthieu noticed, I only had some
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 03.09.2013 21:53, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Jens, I see 1/2 is the same as the previous one you already acked.
Yep.
Does this update to 2/2 look good to you? Sorry, but I lost track
of the discussion that led to this reroll, hence a ping.
v3
Am 04.09.2013 08:31, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes:
Tests are included which verify that this change has no effect on git
submodule
summary without the --for-status option.
I still don't understand why this is needed.
To avoid a change in
Am 04.09.2013 22:57, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 03.09.2013 21:53, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Does this update to 2/2 look good to you? Sorry, but I lost track
of the discussion that led to this reroll, hence a ping.
v3 fixes the bug Matthieu noticed,
Jens, I see 1/2 is the same as the previous one you already acked.
Does this update to 2/2 look good to you? Sorry, but I lost track
of the discussion that led to this reroll, hence a ping.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to
Am 01.09.2013 22:06, schrieb brian m. carlson:
git status prints information for submodules, but it should ignore the status
of
those which have submodule.name.ignore set to all. Fix it so that it does
properly ignore those which have that setting either in .git/config or in
.gitmodules.
git status prints information for submodules, but it should ignore the status of
those which have submodule.name.ignore set to all. Fix it so that it does
properly ignore those which have that setting either in .git/config or in
.gitmodules.
Not ignored are submodules that are added, deleted, or
11 matches
Mail list logo