On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
wrote:
In the previous patch, git_snpath() is modified to allocate a new
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
In the previous patch, git_snpath() is modified to allocate a new
strbuf buffer because vsnpath() needs that. But that makes it awkward
because git_snpath() receives a pre-allocated buffer from outside and
has to
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
wrote:
In the previous patch, git_snpath() is modified to allocate a new
strbuf buffer because vsnpath() needs that. But that makes it awkward
In the previous patch, git_snpath() is modified to allocate a new
strbuf buffer because vsnpath() needs that. But that makes it awkward
because git_snpath() receives a pre-allocated buffer from outside and
has to copy data back. Rename it to strbuf_git_path() and make it
receive strbuf directly.
5 matches
Mail list logo