Re: [PATCH v8 4/7] utf8: add function to detect a missing UTF-16/32 BOM

> On 25 Feb 2018, at 04:52, Eric Sunshine wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:27 AM, wrote: >> If the endianness is not defined in the encoding name, then let's >> be strict and require a BOM to avoid any encoding confusion. The >>

Re: [PATCH v8 4/7] utf8: add function to detect a missing UTF-16/32 BOM

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:27 AM, wrote: > If the endianness is not defined in the encoding name, then let's > be strict and require a BOM to avoid any encoding confusion. The > is_missing_required_utf_bom() function returns true if a required BOM > is missing. > >

[PATCH v8 4/7] utf8: add function to detect a missing UTF-16/32 BOM

From: Lars Schneider If the endianness is not defined in the encoding name, then let's be strict and require a BOM to avoid any encoding confusion. The is_missing_required_utf_bom() function returns true if a required BOM is missing. The Unicode standard instructs to